Literature DB >> 8134487

Tailoring velopharyngeal surgery: the influence of etiology and type of operation.

B G Peat1, E H Albery, K Jones, R W Pigott.   

Abstract

The results of 132 consecutive endoscopically selected pharyngoplasties were assessed. Depending on the size and shape of the velopharyngeal defect on attempted closure, patients had been allocated to one of four pharyngoplasties: (1) a superiorly based pharyngeal flap combined with a V-Y pushback of the soft palate (Honig), (2) a modified Hynes approach, (3) a superiorly based pharyngeal flap, or (4) a fish flap. Patients were categorized according to etiology as having cleft palate, submucous cleft palate, disproportion, or neurologic origin. Acceptable nasal resonance was found after 81 percent of the Honig operations, 81 percent of the Hynes operations, and 63 percent of the superiorly based flap operations, vindicating the selection criteria based on palatal and pharyngeal wall movement. The fish flap operation was successful in only 50 percent and is not recommended. The cleft, submucous cleft, disproportion, and neurologic categories were equally well corrected by the Honig and Hynes operations. Side effects were common, with catarrh or snoring in 51 percent, difficulty breathing through the nose in 27 percent, and 9 percent requiring revision of their pharyngoplasty (6 of 53 Honig and 5 of 63 Hynes operations). The higher median age for those patients requiring pharyngoplasty revision (17 versus 10 years) suggests more cautious use in the older patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8134487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  7 in total

1.  Managing cleft lip and palate. Editorial proves controversial.

Authors:  M J Timmons
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-11-25

2.  A speech nasoendoscopy-based surgeon's decision for correction of velopharyngeal insufficiency following adenotonsillectomy.

Authors:  Sherif M Askar; Tamer S Abou-Elsaad
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Management of velopharyngeal insufficiency using double opposing z-plasty in patients undergoing primary two-flap palatoplasty.

Authors:  Kyung Suk Koh; Sung Chan Kim; Tae Suk Oh
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2013-03-11

Review 4.  In search of the optimal surgical treatment for velopharyngeal dysfunction in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicole E Spruijt; Judith Reijmanhinze; Greet Hens; Vincent Vander Poorten; Aebele B Mink van der Molen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Outcomes of a superiorly-based pharyngeal flap for the correction of velopharyngeal dysfunction.

Authors:  Yong Woo Lee; Yong Chan Bae; Sang Min Park; Soo Bong Nam; Hyung Joon Seo; Geon Woo Kim
Journal:  Arch Craniofac Surg       Date:  2020-02-20

6.  Velo-pharyngeal dysfunction: Evaluation and management.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Marsh
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2009-10

7.  The lateral port control pharyngeal flap: a thirty-year evolution and followup.

Authors:  Sean Boutros; Court Cutting
Journal:  Plast Surg Int       Date:  2013-01-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.