Literature DB >> 813372

[Morphology versus prognosis in renal cell carcinoma a statistical approach].

K Kofler, E R Reichl, W Zischka-Konorsa.   

Abstract

In a group of 102 selected cases of renal cell carcinoma which at various periods after nephrectomy terminated fatally, age, sex, and 23 gross and/or histologic tumor characteristics were examined, subclassified, and evaluated. An attempt was made to correlate these parameters statistically to postoperative survival time. A newly developed and programmed statistical method, i.c. "dichotomic variance analysis", proved to be superior to both multiple regression and cluster analysis. Using infiltrative-destructive tumor growth, polymorphy, and chromatin density of tumor cell nuclei, extension of renal vein invasion, age and sex, as the only 6 required out of 25 distinguished tumor parameters, this statistical multivariate method comprised 7 distinctive groups of different mean geometrical postoperative survival time, obviously corresponding to 7 tumor types of increasing degree of malignancy. By step-wise dichotomic splitting of tumor groups it therefore was possible to delinate schematically some of the complex connections between the criteria or variables of prognostic significance. Conceivable sources of errors possibly influencing reproducibility and practical applicability of the presented dichotomic variance analysis in evaluating prognostic criteria in renal cell carcinoma are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 813372     DOI: 10.1007/BF00432311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol        ISSN: 0340-1227


  16 in total

1.  DISEASE-ORIENTED END RESULTS. A TOOL FOR PATHOLOGICAL-CLINICAL ANALYSIS.

Authors:  J W BERG
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1964-06       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  C J ROBSON
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease.

Authors:  N MANTEL; W HAENSZEL
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Carcinoma of the lung.

Authors:  L G JACOBS; J YEE; I A MAY
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1960 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in the non-Hodgkin's malignant lymphomas.

Authors:  C D Bloomfield; A Goldman; F Dick; R D Brunning; B J Kennedy
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Prognosis in renal carcinoma evaluated from histological criteria.

Authors:  F Amtrup; J B Hansen; E Thybo
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  1974

7.  Retrospective studies. A review for the clinician.

Authors:  P E Sartwell
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Prognostic indicators in Hodgkin's disease.

Authors:  L M Axtell; M H Myers; L H Thomas; C W Berard; A R Kagan; G R Newell
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Correlation and clusteranalytic studies about histological characteristics of the colon-rectum-carcinoma.

Authors:  W W Höpker; K H Wurster; G Döhnert; D Haag; F J Hehl
Journal:  Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol       Date:  1974

10.  The relative significance of prognostic factors in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  M R Alderson; I Hamlin; M D Staunton
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.