Literature DB >> 8133243

Influenza virus hemagglutinin-induced cell-planar bilayer fusion: quantitative dissection of fusion pore kinetics into stages.

G B Melikyan1, W D Niles, F S Cohen.   

Abstract

Cells expressing the influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) fuse to planar bilayer membranes under acidic conditions. After an electrically quiescent perfusion stage (Q), a fusion pore forms that enlarges in three subsequent stages. A repetitively flickering pore stage (R) develops into a securely open stage (S) that exhibits conductances ranging from a few to tens of nS. The pore then expands to a terminal stage (T) with a large conductance on the order of one microSiemens. We have studied how virus strain, HA receptors in the target bilayer membrane, and cytoskeleton affect the time a fusion pore remains in each stage. These intervals are referred to as waiting times. In the quiescent stage, waiting times were very sensitive to the virus strain and presence of gangliosides (HA receptors) in the bilayer. When bilayers contained gangliosides, the waiting times in the Q stage for cells infected with the PR/8/34 strain of virus were exponentially distributed, whereas waiting times for cells infected with the Japan/305/57 strain were not so distributed. Without gangliosides, the waiting time distribution for PR/8/34 infected cells was complex. The waiting times in the R and S stages of pore growth were exponentially distributed under all tested conditions. Within the R stage, we analyzed the kinetics of the flickering pore by fitting the open and closed time distributions with a sum of two exponentials. Neither the open and closed time distributions nor the flickering pore conductance distributions were appreciably affected by virus strain or gangliosides. Colchicine and cytochalasin B increased the flicker rates, without affecting the waiting time in the R stage. We conclude that variations in amino acid sequences of the HAs and the presence of gangliosides as receptors within the target membrane critically affect the kinetics of fusion pore formation, but do not affect subsequent stages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8133243      PMCID: PMC2229187          DOI: 10.1085/jgp.102.6.1151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Physiol        ISSN: 0022-1295            Impact factor:   4.086


  17 in total

1.  Stochastic simulation of hemagglutinin-mediated fusion pore formation.

Authors:  S Schreiber; K Ludwig; A Herrmann; H G Holzhütter
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Initial size and dynamics of viral fusion pores are a function of the fusion protein mediating membrane fusion.

Authors:  Ilya Plonsky; David H Kingsley; Afshin Rashtian; Paul S Blank; Joshua Zimmerberg
Journal:  Biol Cell       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.458

3.  Secretory and viral fusion may share mechanistic events with fusion between curved lipid bilayers.

Authors:  J Lee; B R Lentz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-08-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Toward a unified picture of the exocytotic fusion pore.

Authors:  Erdem Karatekin
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 4.124

Review 5.  Lipids in biological membrane fusion.

Authors:  L Chernomordik; M M Kozlov; J Zimmerberg
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.843

6.  Membrane mechanics can account for fusion pore dilation in stages.

Authors:  Y A Chizmadzhev; F S Cohen; A Shcherbakov; J Zimmerberg
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  The anti-influenza virus agent 4-GU-DANA (zanamivir) inhibits cell fusion mediated by human parainfluenza virus and influenza virus HA.

Authors:  O Greengard; N Poltoratskaia; E Leikina; J Zimmerberg; A Moscona
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  Control of baculovirus gp64-induced syncytium formation by membrane lipid composition.

Authors:  L Chernomordik; E Leikina; M S Cho; J Zimmerberg
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Influenza-virus membrane fusion by cooperative fold-back of stochastically induced hemagglutinin intermediates.

Authors:  Tijana Ivanovic; Jason L Choi; Sean P Whelan; Antoine M van Oijen; Stephen C Harrison
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 10.  Influenza virus-mediated membrane fusion: determinants of hemagglutinin fusogenic activity and experimental approaches for assessing virus fusion.

Authors:  Brian S Hamilton; Gary R Whittaker; Susan Daniel
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 5.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.