Literature DB >> 8133003

Measles immunity in a population of healthcare workers.

M E Willy1, D E Koziol, T Fleisher, S Koo, H McFarland, J Schmitt, R Wesley, E S Hurwitz, D K Henderson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate measles seroprevalence among cohorts of new employees and to evaluate vaccine responses of susceptible adult healthcare workers.
DESIGN: New employees were screened for measles susceptibility as part of employee evaluations. Anti-IgG measles antibody tests were completed on 2,473 workers. Demographic, measles history, and measles vaccination information was collected using a short questionnaire. Susceptible workers were vaccinated and screened for vaccine responses following vaccination.
RESULTS: Ninety-three workers (4%) were seronegative, and 56 (2%) were equivocal. Individuals in the youngest cohort (born after 1956) were significantly more likely to be susceptible than those in the middle cohort (born 1951 to 1956) and those in the oldest cohort (born before 1951) (P < 0.01). The middle cohort included eight (5%) of the 149 seronegative or equivocal workers. Among the members of the youngest cohort, those from the United States were more likely to be susceptible (P < 0.01) than those from outside the United States. Of the 106 vaccinated susceptible workers whose follow-up serologies were determined, 90 (85%) developed positive IgG serologies, six had equivocal results, and 10 were seronegative. Eleven of the 16 non- or hyporesponders were revaccinated and re-evaluated; nine developed low positive IgG antimeasles levels, one exhibited an equivocal response, and one failed to respond.
CONCLUSIONS: A small but important proportion of healthcare workers are susceptible to measles. Whenever feasible, measles immunity programs for healthcare workers should include workers born before 1957. Of workers born after 1956, those from outside the United States are more likely to be immune than workers from inside the United States. Using the currently available vaccine, revaccination of initial non- or hyporesponders appears to be effective.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8133003     DOI: 10.1086/646811

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  5 in total

1.  Healthcare Workers and Post-Elimination Era Measles: Lessons on Acquisition and Exposure Prevention.

Authors:  Shruti K Gohil; Sandra Okubo; Stephen Klish; Linda Dickey; Susan S Huang; Matthew Zahn
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Measles, again--and its implications for occupational health.

Authors:  Erica Weir
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  2007 Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Health Care Settings.

Authors:  Jane D Siegel; Emily Rhinehart; Marguerite Jackson; Linda Chiarello
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.918

Review 4.  A global perspective of vaccination of healthcare personnel against measles: systematic review.

Authors:  Amy Parker Fiebelkorn; Jane F Seward; Walter A Orenstein
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2013-11-24       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Ability of history taking alone to identify early pregnancies among potential measles vaccinees.

Authors:  P B Mead
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.