Literature DB >> 8131828

Responses of the human auditory cortex to changes in one versus two stimulus features.

S Levänen1, R Hari, L McEvoy, M Sams.   

Abstract

Neuromagnetic responses were recorded with a 24-SQUID magnetometer in two "oddball" experiments to determine whether mismatch responses to changes in single stimulus features are additive. In experiment 1, the one-feature deviants differed from standards in interstimulus interval (ISI) or frequency, and the two-feature deviants in both ISI and frequency. In experiment 2, deviants differed in duration, frequency, or both. All deviants evoked a mismatch field (MMF) with sources close to each other in the supratemporal auditory cortex. Except for the ISI deviants, the MMF sources were about 1 cm anterior to the source of the 100-ms response, N100m, to the standards. In the two experiments, MMFs obtained in response to the two-feature deviants resembled closely the sum of MMFs in response to one-feature deviants. The results suggest that the standards leave a multiple neuronal representation in the human auditory cortex. The particular neuronal traces of the representation react independently to changes in different features of sound stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8131828     DOI: 10.1007/bf00228828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  19 in total

1.  Evoked magnetic responses of the human auditory cortex to minor pitch changes: localization of the mismatch field.

Authors:  V Csépe; C Pantev; M Hoke; S Hampson; B Ross
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec

2.  The chronometry of attention-modulated processing and automatic mismatch detection.

Authors:  G Novak; W Ritter; H G Vaughan
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Mismatch detection and the latency of temporal judgements.

Authors:  G Novak; W Ritter; H G Vaughan
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 4.  Magnetoencephalography in the study of human auditory information processing.

Authors:  M Sams; R Hari
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Can echoic memory store two traces simultaneously? A study of event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  I Winkler; P Paavilainen; R Näätänen
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Cortical responses to changes in auditory stimuli. Magnetoencephalographic studies.

Authors:  M Sams
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1991

7.  Cerebral neuromagnetic responses evoked by short auditory stimuli.

Authors:  M Sams; M Hämäläinen; A Antervo; E Kaukoranta; K Reinikainen; R Hari
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-10

8.  Mixed and sensory nerve stimulations activate different cytoarchitectonic areas in the human primary somatosensory cortex SI. Neuromagnetic recordings and statistical considerations.

Authors:  E Kaukoranta; M Hämäläinen; J Sarvas; R Hari
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Human auditory cortical mechanisms of sound lateralization: II. Interaural time differences at sound onset.

Authors:  L McEvoy; R Hari; T Imada; M Sams
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Responses of the primary auditory cortex to pitch changes in a sequence of tone pips: neuromagnetic recordings in man.

Authors:  R Hari; M Hämäläinen; R Ilmoniemi; E Kaukoranta; K Reinikainen; J Salminen; K Alho; R Näätänen; M Sams
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1984-09-07       Impact factor: 3.046

View more
  8 in total

1.  Cortical processing of change detection: dissociation between natural vowels and two-frequency complex tones.

Authors:  M Vihla; O V Lounasmaa; R Salmelin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Automatic auditory processing deficits in schizophrenia and clinical high-risk patients: forecasting psychosis risk with mismatch negativity.

Authors:  Veronica B Perez; Scott W Woods; Brian J Roach; Judith M Ford; Thomas H McGlashan; Vinod H Srihari; Daniel H Mathalon
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 3.  Generators of electrical and magnetic mismatch responses in humans.

Authors:  R Näätänen; K Alho
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Equivalent mismatch negativity deficits across deviant types in early illness schizophrenia-spectrum patients.

Authors:  Rachel A Hay; Brian J Roach; Vinod H Srihari; Scott W Woods; Judith M Ford; Daniel H Mathalon
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2015-01-17       Impact factor: 3.251

5.  Parsing components of auditory predictive coding in schizophrenia using a roving standard mismatch negativity paradigm.

Authors:  Amanda McCleery; Daniel H Mathalon; Jonathan K Wynn; Brian J Roach; Gerhard S Hellemann; Stephen R Marder; Michael F Green
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 7.723

6.  "Change deafness" arising from inter-feature masking within a single auditory object.

Authors:  Nicolas Barascud; Timothy D Griffiths; David McAlpine; Maria Chait
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Integration of consonant and pitch processing as revealed by the absence of additivity in mismatch negativity.

Authors:  Shan Gao; Jiehui Hu; Diankun Gong; Sifan Chen; Keith M Kendrick; Dezhong Yao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Separate and concurrent symbolic predictions of sound features are processed differently.

Authors:  Marika Pieszek; Erich Schröger; Andreas Widmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.