Literature DB >> 8129116

Early mobilization versus immobilization in the treatment of lateral ankle sprains.

M P Eiff1, A T Smith, G E Smith.   

Abstract

We conducted a prospective trial at a military medical center to determine which treatment for first-time ankle sprains, early mobilization or immobilization, is more effective. Eighty-two patients with a lateral ankle sprain were randomly selected for one of two treatment groups. The Early Mobilization Group received an elastic wrap for 2 days followed by functional bracing for 8 days. Two days after injury, this group began weight-bearing and an ankle rehabilitation program. Patients in the Immobilization Group were placed in a nonweight-bearing plaster splint for 10 days followed by weight-bearing and the same rehabilitation program. Patients in the Early Mobilization Group had less pain at 3 weeks (57% versus 87%, P = 0.02); otherwise, there were no significant differences between groups in the frequency of residual symptoms. Only one patient in each group had residual symptoms 1 year after injury. Three patients (8%) in each group resprained their ankles. Ten days after injury, patients in the Early Mobilization Group were more likely to be back to full work (54% versus 13%, P < 0.001). We conclude that in first-time lateral ankle sprains, although both immobilization and early mobilization prevent late residual symptoms and ankle instability, early mobilization allows earlier return to work and may be more comfortable for patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8129116     DOI: 10.1177/036354659402200115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  20 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of acute lateral ankle ligament rupture in the athlete. Conservative versus surgical treatment.

Authors:  S A Lynch; P A Renström
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Towards evidence based emergency medicine: best BETs from the Manchester Royal Infirmary. Mobilisation of lateral ligament ankle sprains.

Authors:  G Higgins
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1999-05

3.  Biomechanical and Neuromuscular Effects of Ankle Taping and Bracing.

Authors:  Gary B Wilkerson
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 4.  Football injuries of the ankle: A review of injury mechanisms, diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Raymond J Walls; Keir A Ross; Ethan J Fraser; Christopher W Hodgkins; Niall A Smyth; Christopher J Egan; James Calder; John G Kennedy
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-01-18

Review 5.  Do voluntary strength, proprioception, range of motion, or postural sway predict occurrence of lateral ankle sprain?

Authors:  M de Noronha; K M Refshauge; R D Herbert; S L Kilbreath; J Hertel
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-08-18       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 6.  National Athletic Trainers' Association position statement: conservative management and prevention of ankle sprains in athletes.

Authors:  Thomas W Kaminski; Jay Hertel; Ned Amendola; Carrie L Docherty; Michael G Dolan; J Ty Hopkins; Eric Nussbaum; Wendy Poppy; Doug Richie
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Supervised exercises for adults with acute lateral ankle sprain: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Rogier M van Rijn; Anton G van Os; Gert-Jan Kleinrensink; Roos Md Bernsen; Jan An Verhaar; Bart W Koes; Sita Ma Bierma-Zeinstra
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 8.  Double bandaging of sprained ankles.

Authors:  S Wilson; M Cooke
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998 Dec 19-26

Review 9.  Ankle ligament injuries.

Authors:  P A Renström; L Konradsen
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 13.800

10.  The Prevalence of Pain in People With Chronic Ankle Instability: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Saeed Al Adal; Fereshteh Pourkazemi; Martin Mackey; Claire E Hiller
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.