Literature DB >> 8128175

Cisapride versus metoclopramide in the treatment of functional dyspepsia. A double-blind comparative trial.

I Fumagalli1, B Hammer.   

Abstract

The efficacy and tolerability of cisapride (5 mg three times daily) and metoclopramide (10 mg three times daily) were evaluated in a randomized double-blind trial in patients with functional dyspepsia. Sixty patients, equally distributed in the two groups, entered the trial. After 4 weeks of treatment there was a significant improvement of symptom severity versus base line (p < 0.001) in both groups. The percentage of responders (with no or only mild symptoms) was 87% in the cisapride group and 77% in the metoclopramide group (no statistically significant intergroup difference). At the follow-up visit 2 weeks after completion of the trial this response rate was significantly higher in the cisapride group (73%) than in the metoclopramide group (47%) (p < 0.05). Four of the patients receiving cisapride and 2 of the patients receiving metoclopramide reported adverse events. On assessment of extrapyrimidal symptoms, relevant clinical values were found in one patient receiving metoclopramide. Increased prolactin concentrations were observed in seven patients of the metoclopramide group versus only 1 of the cisapride group (p < 0.05). The present data indicate that during the 2 weeks after completion of treatment in patients with functional dyspepsia, cisapride may result in a better, more sustained overall response when compared with metoclopramide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8128175     DOI: 10.3109/00365529409090434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  9 in total

1.  Functional dyspepsia.

Authors:  Rita Brun; Braden Kuo
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.409

Review 2.  Visceral hypersensitivity and electromechanical dysfunction as therapeutic targets in pediatric functional dyspepsia.

Authors:  John M Rosen; Jose T Cocjin; Jennifer V Schurman; Jennifer M Colombo; Craig A Friesen
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-08-06

Review 3.  Frontiers in functional dyspepsia.

Authors:  Noel R Fajardo; Filippo Cremonini; Nicholas J Talley
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2005-08

Review 4.  Selection of drugs to treat gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: the role of drug interactions.

Authors:  D A Flockhart; Z Desta; S K Mahal
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Symptom improvement from prokinetic therapy corresponds to improved quality of life in patients with severe dyspepsia.

Authors:  T F Cutts; T L Abell; J G Karas; J Kuns
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 6.  Cisapride. An updated review of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy as a prokinetic agent in gastrointestinal motility disorders.

Authors:  L R Wiseman; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Management of functional dyspepsia: state of the art and emerging therapies.

Authors:  Hiroshi Yamawaki; Seiji Futagami; Mako Wakabayashi; Noriko Sakasegawa; Shuhei Agawa; Kazutoshi Higuchi; Yasuhiro Kodaka; Katsuhiko Iwakiri
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2017-08-27       Impact factor: 5.091

8.  Comparative Efficacy of Various Pharmacological Interventions in the Treatment of Functional Dyspepsia: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Liang Liang; Jia Yu; Ling Xiao; Gaohua Wang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 9.  Modulation of gastrointestinal motility beyond metoclopramide and domperidone : Pharmacological and clinical evidence for phytotherapy in functional gastrointestinal disorders.

Authors:  Ahmed Madisch; Bettina R Vinson; Heba Abdel-Aziz; Olaf Kelber; Karen Nieber; Karin Kraft; Martin Storr
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2017-04-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.