Literature DB >> 8128064

Sonographic evaluation of the breast.

L A Venta1, C M Dudiak, C G Salomon, M E Flisak.   

Abstract

Knowledge of appropriate ultrasonographic (US) techniques and the US appearance of the normal breast and specific lesions is essential for successful application of breast US. The highest quality breast sonograms are achieved with 5-10-MHz linear transducers, imaging the lesion within the transducer focal zone, and relatively steep time-gain compensation curves. On sonograms, the fat in normal breast parenchyma is hypoechoic, fibrous tissue is echogenic, and glandular tissue is intermediate in echogenicity. Some normal structures can simulate masses, including the anterior costochondral junction when imaged in cross section and fat lobules outlined by Cooper ligaments when imaged in a perpendicular plane. Cysts have an anechoic interior, sharp margins, and posterior acoustic enhancement. Benign solid lesions are usually hypoechoic but variable in US appearance, which can overlap with that of complicated cysts. The classic US appearance of breast carcinoma is a hypoechoic mass with inhomogeneous internal echoes, irregular margins, and variable acoustic shadowing, although carcinoma can appear well circumscribed or have posterior acoustic shadowing in some cases. The most important function of breast US is differentiating a cyst from a solid lesion. US is also useful for evaluating a palpable mass in either young patients (< 30 years old) or those with dense breasts and negative mammographic results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8128064     DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.14.1.8128064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  9 in total

Review 1.  A review of breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Chandra M Sehgal; Susan P Weinstein; Peter H Arger; Emily F Conant
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.673

2.  Evaluation of breast enlargement in young males and factors associated with gynecomastia and pseudogynecomastia.

Authors:  M Yazici; M Sahin; E Bolu; D E Gok; A Taslipinar; S Tapan; D Torun; G Uckaya; M Kutlu
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 3.  Ultrasound of pediatric breast masses: what to do with lumps and bumps.

Authors:  Natalie S Valeur; Habib Rahbar; Teresa Chapman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-07-12

4.  Ultrasound assessment of pubertal breast development in girls: intra- and interobserver agreement.

Authors:  Ingvild Særvold Bruserud; Mathieu Roelants; Ninnie Helén Bakken Oehme; Geir Egil Eide; Robert Bjerknes; Karen Rosendahl; Pétur B Júlíusson
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-07-07

5.  Benign versus malignant breast masses: optical differentiation with US-guided optical imaging reconstruction.

Authors:  Quing Zhu; Edward B Cronin; Allen A Currier; Hugh S Vine; Minming Huang; NanGuang Chen; Chen Xu
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Imaging of the adolescent breast.

Authors:  Katie N Jones
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.314

7.  Breast ultrasound: recommendations for information to women and referring physicians by the European Society of Breast Imaging.

Authors:  Andrew Evans; Rubina M Trimboli; Alexandra Athanasiou; Corinne Balleyguier; Pascal A Baltzer; Ulrich Bick; Julia Camps Herrero; Paola Clauser; Catherine Colin; Eleanor Cornford; Eva M Fallenberg; Michael H Fuchsjaeger; Fiona J Gilbert; Thomas H Helbich; Karen Kinkel; Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Christiane K Kuhl; Ritse M Mann; Laura Martincich; Pietro Panizza; Federica Pediconi; Ruud M Pijnappel; Katja Pinker; Sophia Zackrisson; Gabor Forrai; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2018-08-09

8.  B-mode ultrasound diagnostic flowchart for solid breast masses: JABTS BC-01 study.

Authors:  Takanori Watanabe; Takuhiro Yamaguchi; Eriko Tohno; Hiroko Tsunoda; Setsuko Kaoku; Kanako Ban; Ryoji Watanabe; Takeshi Umemoto; Koichi Hirokaga; Toshikazu Ito
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 1.314

9.  Cystic breast lesions by conventional ultrasonography: sonographic subtype-pathologic correlation and BI-RADS Assessment.

Authors:  Man Chen; Wei Wei Zhan; Wen Ping Wang
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 3.318

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.