Literature DB >> 8127994

Psychometric properties of two instruments to measure quality decision making.

P J Hollen1.   

Abstract

The results of testing two instruments for consequential decision making are reported: a screening instrument, the Decision Making Quality Scale (DMQS), which assesses the degree to which a person adheres to seven quality criteria of decision making; and a diagnostic measure, the Decision Making Quality Inventory (DMQI), which assesses an individual's dominant decision-making style through six sequential stages of the process. The instruments are conceptually linked through the same theoretical framework, the Janis and Mann (1977) conflict model of decision making, as well as operationally linked as counterpart instruments. Feasibility of the instruments was demonstrated with low readability indexes, reasonable administration times, and respondent acceptability by six samples (N = 766). Content validity was supported by panels of experts in decision theory. Reliability coefficients were consistently high ( > .70) for all samples. Support for construct validity was obtained using the contrasted groups approach and relationship testing. The instruments are ready for research and clinical use with healthy adolescents and their parents, as well as with adolescents and young adults who have experienced a chronic illness such as cancer and with their parents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8127994     DOI: 10.1002/nur.4770170209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Nurs Health        ISSN: 0160-6891            Impact factor:   2.228


  6 in total

1.  A theory-based decision aid for patients with cancer: results of feasibility and acceptability testing of DecisionKEYS for cancer.

Authors:  Patricia J Hollen; Richard J Gralla; Randy A Jones; Christopher Y Thomas; David R Brenin; Geoffrey R Weiss; Anneke T Schroen; Gina R Petroni
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Factors related to decision making and substance use in adolescent survivors of childhood cancer: a presenting clinical profile.

Authors:  P J Hollen; V L Tyc; S V Shannon; S F Donnangelo; W L Hobbie; M M Hudson; M C O'Laughlen; M E Smolkin; G R Petroni
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  A substance use decision aid for medically at-risk adolescents: results of a randomized controlled trial for cancer-surviving adolescents.

Authors:  Patricia J Hollen; Vida L Tyc; Sarah F Donnangelo; Susan V Shannon; Mary C O'Laughlen; Ivora Hinton; Mark E Smolkin; Gina R Petroni
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.592

4.  Decision-making program for rural adolescents with asthma: a pilot study.

Authors:  Hyekyun Rhee; Patricia J Hollen; Michael J Belyea; Melissa A Sutherland
Journal:  J Pediatr Nurs       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 2.145

Review 5.  Interventions to support children's engagement in health-related decisions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bryan Feenstra; Laura Boland; Margaret L Lawson; Denise Harrison; Jennifer Kryworuchko; Michelle Leblanc; Dawn Stacey
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.125

6.  Vigilance in the Decision-Making Process Regarding Termination of Pregnancy Following Prenatal Diagnosis of Congenital Heart Disease-Application of the 'Conflict Decision-Making Model'.

Authors:  Yulia Gendler; Einat Birk; Nili Tabak; Silvia Koton
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 4.614

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.