Literature DB >> 8126061

Classification and regression trees (CART) for estimation of prognosis in patients with gastric carcinoma.

P Hermanek1, I Guggenmoos-Holzmann.   

Abstract

A total of 961 patients who had received resective surgery for gastric carcinoma were grouped according to prognosis by classification and regression trees (CART). This grouping was compared to the present UICC stage grouping. For patients resected for cure (R0) the CART approach allows a better discrimination of patients with poor prognosis (5-year survival rates 15%-30%) from patients with a 5-year survival of 50%, on the one hand, and from patients with extremely poor prognosis (5-year survival rates below 5%) on the other. In the present investigation CART grouping was not influenced by the differentiation between pT1 and pT2 or between pT3 and pT4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8126061     DOI: 10.1007/bf01236389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  4 in total

1.  Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival.

Authors:  S J CUTLER; F EDERER
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1958-12

2.  Calculation of survival rates for cancer.

Authors:  J BERKSON; R P GAGE
Journal:  Proc Staff Meet Mayo Clin       Date:  1950-05-24

3.  A comparison of estimated proportional hazards models and regression trees.

Authors:  M R Segal; D A Bloch
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Tree-structured survival analysis.

Authors:  L Gordon; R A Olshen
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1985-10
  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Classification and regression tree (CART) analyses of genomic signatures reveal sets of tetramers that discriminate temperature optima of archaea and bacteria.

Authors:  Betsey Dexter Dyer; Michael J Kahn; Mark D Leblanc
Journal:  Archaea       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.273

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.