Literature DB >> 8125474

The utilization of interphase cytogenetic analysis for the detection of mosaicism.

B L Lomax1, D K Kalousek, B D Kuchinka, I J Barrett, K J Harrison, H Safavi.   

Abstract

This study describes a method for defining mosaic aneuploidy by interphase cytogenetics based on statistical limits established from control specimens. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has been used to detect the number of copies of specific chromosomes in interphase nuclei from placental tissues of diploid controls and mosaic placentas. FISH was performed using probes D7Z1/D7Z2, D9Z1, D10Z1, and D18Z1, all purchased from Oncor, Inc. Statistical analysis of data obtained from diploid controls was used to determine the one-sided upper reference limit and corresponding 95% confidence interval for the proportion of cells with one and three signals for each of the probes used. The one-sided upper reference limits established the lower levels of monosomy and trisomy detectable using each of the four probes. These statistical parameters were then used to interpret the results obtained by FISH applied to the study of term placentas for the confirmation of prenatally diagnosed chromosomal mosaicism.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8125474     DOI: 10.1007/bf00212016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  13 in total

1.  Low fluorescence alpha satellite region yields negative result.

Authors:  T Mizunoe; S R Young
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Detection of aneuploidy involving chromosomes 13, 18, or 21, by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to interphase and metaphase amniocytes.

Authors:  W L Kuo; H Tenjin; R Segraves; D Pinkel; M S Golbus; J Gray
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Rapid detection of chromosome aneuploidies in uncultured amniocytes by using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

Authors:  K Klinger; G Landes; D Shook; R Harvey; L Lopez; P Locke; T Lerner; R Osathanondh; B Leverone; T Houseal
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Interphase cytogenetics of brain tumors.

Authors:  E P Arnoldus; I A Noordermeer; A C Peters; J H Voormolen; G T Bots; A K Raap; M van der Ploeg
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 5.006

5.  Delineation of individual human chromosomes in metaphase and interphase cells by in situ suppression hybridization using recombinant DNA libraries.

Authors:  P Lichter; T Cremer; J Borden; L Manuelidis; D C Ward
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Rapid interphase and metaphase assessment of specific chromosomal changes in neuroectodermal tumor cells by in situ hybridization with chemically modified DNA probes.

Authors:  T Cremer; D Tesin; A H Hopman; L Manuelidis
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.905

7.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization with human chromosome-specific libraries: detection of trisomy 21 and translocations of chromosome 4.

Authors:  D Pinkel; J Landegent; C Collins; J Fuscoe; R Segraves; J Lucas; J Gray
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Efficient direct chromosome analyses and enzyme determinations from chorionic villi samples in the first trimester of pregnancy.

Authors:  G Simoni; B Brambati; C Danesino; F Rossella; G L Terzoli; M Ferrari; M Fraccaro
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 9.  Molecular cytogenetics in human cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  J W Gray; D Pinkel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Detection of numerical chromosomal abnormalities in neoplastic hematopoietic cells by in situ hybridization with a chromosome-specific probe.

Authors:  J Anastasi; M M Le Beau; J W Vardiman; C A Westbrook
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.307

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Confined placental mosaicism.

Authors:  D K Kalousek; M Vekemans
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Imbalances of chromosome 17 in medulloblastomas determined by comparative genomic hybridisation and fluorescence in situ hybridisation.

Authors:  J Nicholson; C Wickramasinghe; F Ross; J Crolla; D Ellison
Journal:  Mol Pathol       Date:  2000-12

3.  Androgenetic/biparental mosaicism causes placental mesenchymal dysplasia.

Authors:  K A Kaiser-Rogers; D E McFadden; C A Livasy; J Dansereau; R Jiang; J F Knops; L Lefebvre; K W Rao; W P Robinson
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-05-20       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  Germinal and Somatic Trisomy 21 Mosaicism: How Common is it, What are the Implications for Individual Carriers and How Does it Come About?

Authors:  Maj A Hultén; Jon Jonasson; Ann Nordgren; Erik Iwarsson
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.236

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.