Literature DB >> 8124071

How different afferent inputs control motoneuron discharge and the output of the motoneuron pool.

M D Binder1, C J Heckman, R K Powers.   

Abstract

In theory, there are at least two distinct mechanisms by which afferent inputs could alter motoneuron discharge and shape the output of a motoneuron pool: either by delivering synaptic current to the motoneurons' somata ('classic' synaptic transduction); or by altering the motoneurons' voltage-sensitive conductances (neuromodulation). Recent work has confirmed the operation of both of these mechanisms. It has been shown that the effect of a 'classic' synaptic input on motoneuron firing rate is predicted by the product of the effective synaptic current and the slope of the motoneuron's frequency-current relation. It has also been shown that neuromodulators can alter both the slope of a motoneuron's frequency-current relation and its threshold for repetitive firing. It is argued here, however, that when two or more sources of synaptic input are activated concurrently, the distinction between these two mechanisms is blurred. Computer simulations of motoneuron and motor pool behavior have proved extremely useful in understanding these processes.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8124071     DOI: 10.1016/0959-4388(93)90177-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol        ISSN: 0959-4388            Impact factor:   6.627


  17 in total

1.  Posture interacts with arm weight support to modulate corticomotor excitability to the upper limb.

Authors:  Keith D Runnalls; Greg Anson; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Central fatigue during a long-lasting submaximal contraction of the triceps surae.

Authors:  W N Löscher; A G Cresswell; A Thorstensson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  The potential for understanding the synaptic organization of human motor commands via the firing patterns of motoneurons.

Authors:  Michael D Johnson; Christopher K Thompson; Vicki M Tysseling; Randall K Powers; Charles J Heckman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Synaptic control of motoneuronal excitability.

Authors:  J C Rekling; G D Funk; D A Bayliss; X W Dong; J L Feldman
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 37.312

5.  Intrinsic excitability of human motoneurons in biceps brachii versus triceps brachii.

Authors:  Jessica M Wilson; Christopher K Thompson; Laura C Miller; Charles J Heckman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Glutamatergic input varies with phrenic motor neuron size.

Authors:  Sabhya Rana; Carlos B Mantilla; Gary C Sieck
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The anthroform biorobotic arm: a system for the study of spinal circuits.

Authors:  B Hannaford; J M Winters; C P Chou; P H Marbot
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Repetitive firing properties of developing rat brainstem motoneurones.

Authors:  F Viana; D A Bayliss; A J Berger
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1995-08-01       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  The excitability of lumbar motoneurones in the neonatal rat is increased by a hyperpolarization of their voltage threshold for activation by descending serotonergic fibres.

Authors:  Jonathan Gilmore; Brent Fedirchuk
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Recruitment in retractor bulbi muscle during eyeblink conditioning: EMG analysis and common-drive model.

Authors:  N F Lepora; J Porrill; C H Yeo; C Evinger; P Dean
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.