Literature DB >> 8123486

Immunoradiometric detection of pS2 and total cathepsin D in primary breast cancer biopsies: their correlation with steroid receptors.

S Marsigliante1, L Biscozzo, M Correale, A Paradiso, G Leo, I Abbate, C D Dragone, C Storelli.   

Abstract

Commercially available immunoradiometric assays were used for pS2 and total cathepsin D determination in the cytosol fraction obtained from 266 primary breast cancers. We show that pS2 and cathepsin D values were significantly associated (Spearman's rank correlation: P < 0.0001) in tumours from lymph node-positive patients (N+), while such association did not reach significance in tumours taken from patients with negative lymph nodes (N-). Moreover, cathepsin D concentrations in pS2-rich tumours (pS2 above the median value, 5 ng mg-1 protein) were significantly higher (Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon's rank-sum test: P = 0.00001) than those obtained in the samples expressing less than 5 ng of pS2 per mg of protein. pS2 was also correlated to both the oestrogen receptor (ER) (Spearman's rank correlation: P < 0.0001) and the progesterone receptor (PR) (Spearman's rank correlation: P = 0.022). No significant differences in the expression of pS2 and cathepsin D taken from N+ and N- patients were found. Furthermore, no significant differences in pS2 and cathepsin D expression were obtained by stratifying tumours on the basis of their size (T). pS2 and cathepsin D values obtained in ER-positive/PR-positive tumours did not significantly differ from the values obtained in ER-positive/PR-negative and in ER-negative/PR-positive tumours. We conclude that pS2 could have a role in cathepsin D expression, and that it can be used in the assessment of a functioning oestrogen response machinery in those tumours that express only ER.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8123486      PMCID: PMC1968878          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1994.100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  38 in total

1.  Predicting response to endocrine therapy in human breast cancer: a hypothesis.

Authors:  K B Horwitz; W L McGuire
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-08-29       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding.

Authors:  M M Bradford
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1976-05-07       Impact factor: 3.365

3.  Relationship between estrogen receptor values and clinical data in predicting the response to endocrine therapy for patients with advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  D P Byar; M E Sears; W L McGuire
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Cloning of cDNA sequences of hormone-regulated genes from the MCF-7 human breast cancer cell line.

Authors:  P Masiakowski; R Breathnach; J Bloch; F Gannon; A Krust; P Chambon
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1982-12-20       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Estrogen receptor status: an important variable in predicting response to endocrine therapy in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  J C Allegra; M E Lippman; E B Thompson; R Simon; A Barlock; L Green; K K Huff; H M Do; S C Aitken; R Warren
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  A secreted glycoprotein induced by estrogen in human breast cancer cell lines.

Authors:  B Westley; H Rochefort
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Evidence that estrogen-receptor-negative, progesterone-receptor-positive breast and ovarian carcinomas contain estrogen receptor.

Authors:  A M Sarrif; J R Durant
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Breast cancer estrogen and progesterone receptor values: their distribution, degree of concordance, and relation to number of positive axillary nodes.

Authors:  B Fisher; D L Wickerham; A Brown; C K Redmond
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Progesterone receptors as a prognostic factor in Stage II breast cancer.

Authors:  G M Clark; W L McGuire; C A Hubay; O H Pearson; J S Marshall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-12-01       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Prognostic significance of estrogen receptor status in breast cancer in relation to tumor stage, axillary node metastasis, and histopathologic grading.

Authors:  F F Parl; B P Schmidt; W D Dupont; R K Wagner
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cathepsin D immunoreactivity in ovarian cancer: correlation with prognostic factors.

Authors:  P Athanassiadou; V Sakellariou; E Petrakakou; P Athanassiades; C Zerva; A Liossi; S Michalas
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  Low levels of cathepsin D are associated with a poor prognosis in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  O Falcón; R Chirino; L León; A López-Bonilla; S Torres; L Fernández; J A García-Hernández; P F Valerón; J C Díaz-Chico
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.640

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.