Literature DB >> 8123429

Evidence of temporal lobe activation by discriminative spatial orientation.

J F DeFrance1, C Hymel, J Degionanni, F Kutyna, D S Calkins, S Estes, F C Schweitzer.   

Abstract

The results from this spatial orientation, or cue priming, investigation found that targets presented to the contralateral visual fields differentially activated the temporal zones. For instance, stimulation within the right visual field lead to activation of the left temporal zones, as indexed by the relative prominence of the association negativity, N2. The converse was true for left visual field stimulation. For both visual field stimulation, the N2 component also showed an occipital and parietal distribution. The P300 component, which is presumed to be modulated by medial temporal lobe structures, showed the classic centroparietal distribution. Somewhat surprisingly, differences between the primed (e.g., 'facilitated') and 'normal' conditions for the N2 component appeared restricted to the occipital zones. Here, the significant variable was the N2 peak latency. Hence, the priming cue appears to quicken the maximal development of the N2 processing component, preferentially over the occipital cortex, and this may partially explain the faster reaction times in the 'facilitated' conditions for both visual fields.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8123429     DOI: 10.1007/bf01191079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Topogr        ISSN: 0896-0267            Impact factor:   3.020


  11 in total

1.  Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty.

Authors:  S Sutton; M Braren; J Zubin; E R John
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-11-26       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Neural systems control of spatial orienting.

Authors:  M I Posner; Y Cohen; R D Rafal
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1982-06-25       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Cognitive evoked potentials as modulatory processes in human memory formation and retrieval.

Authors:  E Halgren; M E Smith
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1987

4.  A new system for gray-level surface distribution maps of electrical activity.

Authors:  M S Buchsbaum; F Rigal; R Coppola; J Cappelletti; C King; J Johnson
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1982-02

5.  Endogenous potentials generated in the human hippocampal formation and amygdala by infrequent events.

Authors:  E Halgren; N K Squires; C L Wilson; J W Rohrbaugh; T L Babb; P H Crandall
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-11-14       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Hemispheric differences in the neural processing of stimulus location and type: effects of selective attention on visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  M R Harter; C Aine; C Schroeder
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  The scalp topography of potentials associated with missing visual or auditory stimuli.

Authors:  R Simson; H G Vaughan; W Ritter
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-01

8.  Significance probability mapping: an aid in the topographic analysis of brain electrical activity.

Authors:  F H Duffy; P H Bartels; J L Burchfiel
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-05

9.  Neural processes involved in directing attention.

Authors:  M R Harter; S L Miller; N J Price; M E Lalonde; A L Keyes
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Asymmetries in hemispheric control of attention in schizophrenia.

Authors:  M I Posner; T S Early; E Reiman; P J Pardo; M Dhawan
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1988-09
View more
  1 in total

1.  Hemispheric differences in auditory oddball responses during monaural versus binaural stimulation.

Authors:  Casey S Gilmore; Brett A Clementz; Patrick Berg
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 2.997

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.