OBJECTIVE: There is a growing demand both for respect for patient autonomy regarding the use of sophisticated technology and for consideration of health care expenditures at the end of life. The major objective of this study was to assess the relationship between the documentation of a discussion of advance directives and hospital charges for Medicare patients during the last hospitalization of the patient's life. DESIGN: Multivariate analysis of a retrospective cohort. SETTING: Large (700+ beds), private university, tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: All 474 patients who had Medicare listed as their primary insurer and who died in the hospital between January 1 and June 30 in 1990, 1991, or 1992. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Total inpatient charges. RESULTS: The mean inpatient charge for the 342 patients without documentation of a discussion of advance directives was more than three times that of the 132 patients with such documentation ($95.305 vs $30,478). This relationship remained statistically significant after controlling for severity of disease, use of an intensive care unit, and number of procedures. Demographics, length of stay, admitting service, admitting diagnosis, and previous admission to the study hospital did not contribute to the predictive model. CONCLUSIONS: During discussions of advance directives, patients often opt to limit the extent of care they desire in certain situations. Although the most appropriate setting for developing advance directives is not clear, the results of this study imply that an enormous cost savings to society may be realized if such discussions take place, while, at the same time, autonomous patient choice will be respected.
OBJECTIVE: There is a growing demand both for respect for patient autonomy regarding the use of sophisticated technology and for consideration of health care expenditures at the end of life. The major objective of this study was to assess the relationship between the documentation of a discussion of advance directives and hospital charges for Medicare patients during the last hospitalization of the patient's life. DESIGN: Multivariate analysis of a retrospective cohort. SETTING: Large (700+ beds), private university, tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: All 474 patients who had Medicare listed as their primary insurer and who died in the hospital between January 1 and June 30 in 1990, 1991, or 1992. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Total inpatient charges. RESULTS: The mean inpatient charge for the 342 patients without documentation of a discussion of advance directives was more than three times that of the 132 patients with such documentation ($95.305 vs $30,478). This relationship remained statistically significant after controlling for severity of disease, use of an intensive care unit, and number of procedures. Demographics, length of stay, admitting service, admitting diagnosis, and previous admission to the study hospital did not contribute to the predictive model. CONCLUSIONS: During discussions of advance directives, patients often opt to limit the extent of care they desire in certain situations. Although the most appropriate setting for developing advance directives is not clear, the results of this study imply that an enormous cost savings to society may be realized if such discussions take place, while, at the same time, autonomous patient choice will be respected.
Entities:
Keywords:
Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health
Authors: Kara E Bischoff; Rebecca Sudore; Yinghui Miao; Walter John Boscardin; Alexander K Smith Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2013-01-25 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: J M Teno; R B Hakim; W A Knaus; N S Wenger; R S Phillips; A W Wu; P Layde; A F Connors; N V Dawson; J Lynn Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 1995-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Nneka N Ufere; Jennifer L Halford; Joshua Caldwell; Min Young Jang; Sunil Bhatt; John Donlan; Janet Ho; Vicki Jackson; Raymond T Chung; Areej El-Jawahri Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2019-10-23 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Billingsley Kaambwa; Julie Ratcliffe; Sandra L Bradley; Stacey Masters; Owen Davies; Craig Whitehead; Catherine Milte; Ian D Cameron; Tracey Young; Jason Gordon; Maria Crotty Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2015-12-09 Impact factor: 2.655