Literature DB >> 8122889

Predictive value of induction of psychogenic seizures by suggestion.

M E Lancman1, J J Asconapé, W J Craven, G Howard, J K Penry.   

Abstract

Induction by suggestion has previously been reported to be effective in the diagnosis of psychogenic seizures (PS). However, the sensitivity and specificity of this procedure has not previously been studied. Results of induction of PS by suggestion were analyzed in 93 patients with purely PS. The diagnosis of PS was based on the recording of a clinical event on video-electroencephalography, the absence of clinical or electroencephalography the absence of clinical or electroencephalographic evidence of epilepsy, and the subsequent followup and withdrawal of anticonvulsants supporting the diagnosis of PS. A control-group was composed of 20 patients with epilepsy in which induction was tried. Both groups were comparable for age, sex, and educational level. Induction was performed following a standardized protocol. The test was carried out placing a colored patch on the neck. The test was considered positive when the induced clinical events were typical, according to a witness familiar with the patient's seizures. Induction was positive in 72 of 93 cases with PS and in none with epilepsy. Sensitivity of this test for the diagnosis of PS was 77.4%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, and negative predictive value 48.7%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8122889     DOI: 10.1002/ana.410350319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Neurol        ISSN: 0364-5134            Impact factor:   10.422


  11 in total

1.  Usefulness of prolonged video-EEG monitoring and provocative procedure with saline injection for the diagnosis of non epileptic seizures of psychogenic origin.

Authors:  Pascale Ribaï; Patrick Tugendhaft; Benjamin Legros
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2005-10-10       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  The nocebo effect and its relevance for clinical practice.

Authors:  Luana Colloca; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 4.312

Review 3.  Differentiating between nonepileptic and epileptic seizures.

Authors:  Orrin Devinsky; Deana Gazzola; W Curt LaFrance
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 4.  A review of diagnostic techniques in the differential diagnosis of epileptic and nonepileptic seizures.

Authors:  Dona E Cragar; David T R Berry; Toufic A Fakhoury; Jean E Cibula; Frederick A Schmitt
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.444

5.  The potential of a placebo/nocebo effect in pharmacogenetics.

Authors:  S B Haga; L R Warner; J O'Daniel
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  The impact of sexual abuse on psychopathology of patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures.

Authors:  Iolanda Martino; Antonio Cerasa; Roberta Vasta; Antonio Gambardella; Angelo Labate
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 7.  Long-term video EEG monitoring for diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures.

Authors:  Evan R Gedzelman; Suzette M LaRoche
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.570

8.  Role of Short Term Video Encephalography with Induction by Verbal Suggestion in Diagnosis of Suspected Paroxysmal Nonepileptic Seizure-Like Symptoms.

Authors:  Soaham Dilip Desai; Devangi Desai; Trilok Jani
Journal:  Epilepsy Res Treat       Date:  2016-11-17

9.  Nocebo effects in clinical studies: hints for pain therapy.

Authors:  Regine Klinger; Maxie Blasini; Julia Schmitz; Luana Colloca
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2017-01-26

Review 10.  Proposal for best practice in the use of video-EEG when psychogenic non-epileptic seizures are a possible diagnosis.

Authors:  Kimberley Whitehead; Nick Kane; Alistair Wardrope; Ros Kandler; Markus Reuber
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2017-06-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.