Literature DB >> 8122727

[Regional anesthetic procedures in pediatric anesthesia].

M Semsroth1, A Gabriel, A Sauberer, G Wuppinger.   

Abstract

Regional anaesthetic procedures are not popular in paediatric anaesthesia in many institutions. However, regional anaesthesia is gaining ground, especially in a "new" concept of balanced paediatric anaesthesia. The decisive argument for the use of regional anaesthesia is the prolongation of pain relief further into the postoperative phase. The minimal haemodynamic and respiratory side effects during epidural and spinal anaesthesia, the reduced narcotic requirement and the potential early mobilisation all speak in favour of practical application of these techniques. Specially adapted needles and catheters have reduced the technical limitations. The use of nerve stimulators has optimize the accuracy of needle and catheter positioning. The use of a nerve stimulator is therefore highly recommended for peripheral nerve blocks in children. On the other hand, the use of regional anaesthesia in children has potential disadvantages, which should be considered. Special knowledge and continuous training are required. Many techniques are time consuming and personnel intensive, at least temporarily, and the combination of general and regional anesthesia exposes the child to the potential risk inherent in both procedures. The aim of this paper is to discuss procedures which have gained favour in paediatric regional anaesthesia during the past few years. These include caudal, epidural and spinal anaesthesia, especially for infants with high narcotic risk, as well as fascia iliaca compartment blocks for lower extremity analgesia and penile blocks. Many peripheral nerve blocks require special experience and therefore are not discussed here, but they are used routinely by specialists in all age groups. Good anatomic and pharmacologic knowledge should be a prerequisite for all physicians who use regional anaesthetic procedures. Continuous training and critical analysis are needed for good results. Only then can such methods be introduced into routine paediatric anaesthetic practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8122727     DOI: 10.1007/s001010050033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  4 in total

1.  [Intravenous midazolam-ketamine anaesthesia for closed reduction of forearm fractures in children: impact of additional axillary plexus anaesthesia].

Authors:  M Wissler; M Tomaske; K Stutz; A Schmitz; A Gerber; M Weiss
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  The effect of local anaesthetic on post-operative pain with wound instillation via a catheter for paediatric orthopaedic extremity surgery.

Authors:  T Bulut; A Yilmazlar; B Yavascaoglu; B Sarisozen
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 1.548

3.  A comparative study of the effect of caudal dexmedetomidine versus morphine added to bupivacaine in pediatric infra-umbilical surgery.

Authors:  Hossam A El Shamaa; Mohamed Ibrahim
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2014-04

4.  Postoperative analgesic efficacy of epidural tramadol as adjutant to ropivacaine in adult upper abdominal surgeries.

Authors:  Anil P Singh; Dharmraj Singh; Yashpal Singh; Gaurav Jain
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2015 Sep-Dec
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.