Literature DB >> 8122702

Hearing preservation in cerebellopontine angle tumor surgery: the NYU experience 1974-1991.

N L Cohen1, W S Lewis, J Ransohoff.   

Abstract

Between 1974 and 1991, hearing preservation surgery was attempted on 161 of 476 patients with a variety of cerebellopontine (CPA) tumors, at New York University School of Medicine. This included 146 unilateral acoustic neuromas, seven meningiomas, and six cases of neurofibromatosis. The suboccipital/retrosigmoid approach was used almost exclusively. The cochlear nerve was anatomically preserved in 131 cases, 32 percent of whom had successful hearing preservation. In the most successful group, hearing was preserved in 9 of 12 patients (75%). Success was defined as a postoperative pure-tone average (PTA) or speech reception threshold (SRT) of no more than 50 dB, and a speech discrimination score (SDS) of at least 50 percent. In those patients whose preoperative hearing was worse that this, success was based on a loss of no more than 10 dB in PTA or SRT, and 10 percent in SDS. Success was dependent mostly on extracanalicular (EC) tumor size, with the smallest tumors yielding the best results. When controlled for EC size, intracanalicular size and preoperative hearing were statistically significant variables. Origin from the superior vestibular nerve was also a favorable prognostic indicator. The character and duration of hearing loss, the patient's age, and the histology of the tumor did not have prognostic value. Auditory monitoring with either auditory brainstem response (ABR) or direct eighth nerve electrodes did not have a significant impact on success. Complications were somewhat increased by attempted hearing preservation. Facial nerve function was type I or II in 93 percent of patients. Cerebrospinal fluid leaks occurred in 15 percent of cases, but only 4 percent required surgical repair. There was one death, a patient with a 2.5-cm tumor. Early in the series, when a classic long vertical nuchal incision was used, headache and neck pain were common.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8122702     DOI: 10.1097/00129492-199309000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Otol        ISSN: 0192-9763


  14 in total

1.  Advantages of a new, atraumatic, self-retaining electrode for direct cochlear nerve monitoring.

Authors:  M J Ruckenstein; R A Cueva; G R Prioleau
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  1997

2.  The enlarged translabyrinthine and transapical extension type I approach for large vestibular schwannomas.

Authors:  N Jayashankar; K P Morwani; S K Sankhla; R Agrawal
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-01-01

Review 3.  Surgery of the ear and the lateral skull base: pitfalls and complications.

Authors:  Bernhard Schick; Julia Dlugaiczyk
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-12-13

4.  Cranial nerve preservation in surgery for large acoustic neuromas.

Authors:  J Thomas Roland; Andrew J Fishman; John G Golfinos; Noel Cohen; George Alexiades; Alexis H Jackman
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2004-05

5.  Prediction of the origin of intracanalicular neoplasms with high-resolution MR imaging.

Authors:  S Furuta; S Takahashi; S Higano; S Hashimoto
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2005-06-14       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Clinical and Radiographic Factors Predicting Hearing Preservation Rates in Large Vestibular Schwannomas.

Authors:  Daniel Mendelsohn; Brian D Westerberg; Charles Dong; Ryojo Akagami
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2015-09-14

7.  Acoustic neuroma surgery as an interdisciplinary approach: a neurosurgical series of 508 patients.

Authors:  J C Tonn; H P Schlake; R Goldbrunner; C Milewski; J Helms; K Roosen
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 8.  [Cerebellopontine angle surgery. Part 2: Specific remarks].

Authors:  B Schaller
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2003-03-28       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  ASNM position statement: intraoperative monitoring of auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  William Hal Martin; Mark M Stecker
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.977

10.  Hearing recovery after surgical resection of non-vestibular schwannoma cerebellopontine angle tumors.

Authors:  Naira Mkrtchyan; Lauranne Alciato; Michel Kalamarides; Daniele Bernardeschi; Olivier Sterkers; Isabelle Bernat; Mustapha Smail; Nadya Pyatigorskaya; Ghizlene Lahlou
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.