Literature DB >> 8122691

Interaction of sucralfate with antibiotics used for selective decontamination of the gastrointestinal tract.

B Feron1, C G Adair, S P Gorman, B McClurg.   

Abstract

The interactions of sucralfate with colistin sulfate, with tobramycin sulfate, and with amphotericin B were studied. Sucralfate 500 mg was added to 40 mL of distilled water adjusted to pH 3.5 with hydrochloric acid. Stock solution of one of the three antibiotics was added to give a final colistin concentration of 50 mg/L (as the sulfate salt), final tobramycin concentration of 50 mg/L (as the sulfate salt), and final amphotericin B concentration of 25 mg/L. Samples were removed from each sucralfate-antibiotic mixture at 0, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 minutes and analyzed for antibiotic concentration by high-performance liquid chromatography (colistin), enzyme immunoassay (tobramycin), and spectrophotometry (amphotericin B). To determine if any interaction was reversible, the mixtures were stored for 90 minutes without sampling, the pH was adjusted to 6.5-7.0, and samples were removed and analyzed. All tests were performed in triplicate, and the temperature was maintained at 25 degrees C. Significant drug loss was observed starting at five minutes for each antibiotic-sucralfate mixture. This effect was not reversible in the less acidic environment. The concentrations of colistin, tobramycin, and amphotericin B declined rapidly when each drug was combined separately with sucralfate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8122691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm        ISSN: 0002-9289


  5 in total

Review 1.  Drug, meal and formulation interactions influencing drug absorption after oral administration. Clinical implications.

Authors:  D Fleisher; C Li; Y Zhou; L H Pao; A Karim
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Selective decontamination of the digestive tract: 13 years on, what it is and what it is not.

Authors:  D Baxby; H K van Saene; C P Stoutenbeek; D F Zandstra
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Reply to "selective digestive tract decontamination and spread of colistin resistance: antibiotic prophylaxis is not a substitute for hygiene".

Authors:  Teysir Halaby; Nashwan Al Naiemi; Christina M J E Vandenbroucke-Grauls
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  The effect of selective decontamination of the digestive tract on mortality in multiple trauma patients: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  C P Stoutenbeek; H K F van Saene; R A Little; A Whitehead
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Current guidelines on stress ulcer prophylaxis.

Authors:  M Tryba; D Cook
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 9.546

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.