Literature DB >> 8122521

A paradigm for skeletal strength homeostasis.

D B Kimmel1.   

Abstract

This article integrates engineering principles with skeletal biology to describe skeletal strength homeostasis. Skeletal strength revolves around its perceived mechanical usage. Mass, geometric properties, and fatigue damage burden are the principle determinants of structural strength. Bone cells form sensor and effector systems that monitor usage and adjust strength and stiffness by changing mass, geometric properties, and fatigue damage burden. The bone lining cell-osteocyte complex is the sensor; the bone modeling and remodeling systems are the effectors. Deformation and fatigue damage in bone are the signals received by the sensor. Accumulated energy in the sensor's cytoskeleton determines the rate at which the sensor sends messages to the effectors. The activity of both effector systems is proportional to the rate of incoming messages. Modeling raises bone strength and stiffness by improving geometric properties as it adds bone where customary deformation is greatest. Remodeling improves bone strength by replacing fatigue-damaged areas without mass changes. Bone removed during modeling and remodeling comes from sites where the impact on bone strength and stiffness is least. Hormones and agents alter the rigidity of the cytoskeleton and, thus, its capacity to deform and store energy. Osteopenic agents make it more rigid, causing detection of fewer deformations and transmission of fewer loading signals to the effector. Osteotropic agents decrease the rigidity of the cytoskeleton, causing detection of more strain events and transmission of more loading signals to the effector. Agent treatment thus establishes false conditions of disuse or hyperuse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8122521     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650081317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  7 in total

1.  Osteocyte lacunae tissue strain in cortical bone.

Authors:  Daniel P Nicolella; Donald E Moravits; Adrian M Gale; Lynda F Bonewald; James Lankford
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Non-uniform decay in jumping exercise-induced bone gains following 12 and 24 weeks of cessation of exercise in rats.

Authors:  Foong-Kiew Ooi; Rabindarjeet Singh; Harbindar Jeet Singh; Yoshohisa Umemura; Seigo Nagasawa
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 2.781

3.  Comparison of areal and estimated volumetric bone mineral density values between older men and women.

Authors:  R A Faulkner; R G McCulloch; S L Fyke; W E De Coteau; H A McKay; D A Bailey; C S Houston; A A Wilkinson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Structural and Material Determinants Influencing the Behavior of Porous Ti and Its Alloys Made by Additive Manufacturing Techniques for Biomedical Applications.

Authors:  Magda Dziaduszewska; Andrzej Zieliński
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 5.  Role of Osteocyte-derived Insulin-Like Growth Factor I in Developmental Growth, Modeling, Remodeling, and Regeneration of the Bone.

Authors:  Matilda H C Sheng; K H William Lau; David J Baylink
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2014-02-28

Review 6.  Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: A review.

Authors:  Wenhao Wang; Kelvin W K Yeung
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2017-06-07

7.  An immunofluorescence study on VEGF and extracellular matrix proteins in human periodontal ligament during tooth movement.

Authors:  Angela Militi; Giuseppina Cutroneo; Angelo Favaloro; Giovanni Matarese; Debora Di Mauro; Floriana Lauritano; Antonio Centofanti; Gabriele Cervino; Fabiana Nicita; Alessia Bramanti; Giuseppina Rizzo
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-10-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.