Literature DB >> 8120918

Age-specific effectiveness of the Nijmegen population-based breast cancer-screening program: assessment of early indicators of screening effectiveness.

P G Peer1, R Holland, J H Hendriks, M Mravunac, A L Verbeek.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The benefits of mammographic screening for breast cancer are not clear for women less than 50 years old.
PURPOSE: Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of breast cancer screening in different age groups.
METHODS: A mammographic breast cancer-screening program with a 2-year screening interval has been under way in Nijmegen, The Netherlands, since 1975. After eight rounds, more than 40,000 women have been invited to participate. All breast cancer cases diagnosed in the invited population, whether detected by screening or clinically, have been considered in this study. The age groups are younger than 50 years, 50-69 years, and 70 years or older at last invitation before diagnosis. Our assessment of the effectiveness of screening is based on the proportion of screen-detected cancers among all cancers and on the disease stage at diagnosis.
RESULTS: For women younger than 50, compliance was 75%, and 37% (85/230) of the cancers were detected by screening. The age group 50-69 years had a compliance of 65% with 48% (288/595) of cancers detected by screening, and the group 70 years or older had a 25% compliance with 35% (108/305) of cancers detected by screening. The sizes of the cancers detected by screening were smaller than those detected clinically for all age groups. The age group under 50 showed no substantial difference in the proportion of positive axillary lymph node status between screening-detected and clinically diagnosed cancers, while among older women, the proportion of lymph node involvement was substantially higher for clinically detected cases. A significantly lower frequency of advanced stages was observed in screen-detected compared with clinically diagnosed cancers for women 50 years of age or older (P < .001) but not in women under 50 (P = .35).
CONCLUSIONS: No positive effect of the biennial screening program is apparent for women under age 50. For women aged 50 and above, the screen-detected cancers have a more favorable stage distribution than clinically diagnosed cancers, a prerequisite for a reduction in breast cancer mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8120918     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/86.6.436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  10 in total

Review 1.  Mammographic screening in older women. Is it worthwhile?

Authors:  J A van Dijck; M J Broeders; A L Verbeek
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  Age specific sensitivity and sojourn time in a breast cancer screening programme (DOM) in The Netherlands: a comparison of different methods.

Authors:  C T Brekelmans; P Westers; J A Faber; P H Peeters; H J Collette
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Conversion to core biopsy in preoperative diagnosis of breast lesions: is it justified by results?

Authors:  J Shannon; A G Douglas-Jones; N S Dallimore
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  The limitations of breast cancer screening for first-degree relatives of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  A I Neugut; J S Jacobson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Stratification of palpable and nonpalpable breast cancer by method of detection and age.

Authors:  P W Perdue; C Galbo; B C Ghosh
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Information dynamics in living systems: prokaryotes, eukaryotes, and cancer.

Authors:  B Roy Frieden; Robert A Gatenby
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Mammographic screening after the age of 65 years: early outcomes in the Nijmegen programme.

Authors:  J van Dijck; A Verbeek; J Hendriks; R Holland; M Mravunac
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Observed and Predicted Risk of Breast Cancer Death in Randomized Trials on Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Philippe Autier; Mathieu Boniol; Michel Smans; Richard Sullivan; Peter Boyle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Prognosis of younger and older patients with early breast cancer.

Authors:  P G Peer; A L Verbeek; M Mravunac; J H Hendriks; R Holland
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  The growth law of primary breast cancer as inferred from mammography screening trials data.

Authors:  D Hart; E Shochat; Z Agur
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.