A critical analysis of acutely injured children managed in an adult level I trauma center.

The triage of all injured children to regional pediatric trauma centers may be impractical and unnecessarily exclude adult level I trauma centers from the care of the acutely injured child. The purpose of this study was to critically evaluate the outcome of injured children treated in an adult level I trauma center by adult trauma surgeons. The records of 410 consecutively treated children (age < or = 15 years) and 188 young adults (age 16 to 18 years) admitted to the trauma service during a 2-year period (ending December 1991) were studied. The probability of survival was calculated using TRISS methodology. Results were analyzed using the Z statistic, permitting objective comparison with national norms (Major Trauma Outcome Study). Severity of injury (RTS and ISS) was equivalent (P > .05) in children and young adults. The observed survival (98.0%) in children compared favorably with the predicted survival (TRISS) of 97.7%. Calculation of the Z statistic showed no difference in outcomes of acutely injured children (+0.47) relative to young adults (+0.45) or national norms (MTOS). The triage of injured children to an adult level I trauma center does not adversely affect outcome. Subset analysis of injured children showed no differences in observed outcome relative to predicted outcome (national control) or outcome in young adults (institutional control). These data support the continued triage of acutely injured children to regional trauma centers regardless of pediatric or adult designation.