Literature DB >> 8120604

Responses of pigeon vestibulocerebellar neurons to optokinetic stimulation. II. The 3-dimensional reference frame of rotation neurons in the flocculus.

D R Wylie1, B J Frost.   

Abstract

1. The complex spike activity of Purkinje cells in the flocculus in response to rotational flowfields was recorded extracellularly in anesthetized pigeons. 2. The optokinetic stimulus was produced by a rotating "planetarium projector." A light source was placed in the center of a tin cylinder, which was pierced with numerous small holes. A pen motor oscillated the cylinder about its long axis. This apparatus was placed above the bird's head and the resultant rotational flow-field was projected onto screens that surrounded the bird on all four sides. The axis of rotation of the planetarium could be oriented to any position in three-dimensional space. 3. Two types of responses were found: vertical axis (VA; n = 43) neurons responded best to visual rotation about the vertical axis, and H-135i neurons (n = 34) responded best to rotation about a horizontal axis. The preferred orientation of the horizontal axis was at approximately 135 degrees ipsilateral azimuth. VA neurons were excited by rotation about the vertical axis producing forward (temporal to nasal) and backward motion in the ipsilateral and contralateral eyes, respectively, and were inhibited by rotation in the opposite direction. H-135i neurons in the left flocculus were excited by counterclockwise rotation about the 135 degrees ipsilateral horizontal axis and were inhibited by clockwise motion. Thus, the VA and H-135i neurons, respectively, encode visual flowfields resulting from head rotations stimulating the ipsilateral horizontal and ipsilateral anterior semicircular canals. 4. Sixty-seven percent of VA and 80% of H-135i neurons had binocular receptive fields, although for most binocular cells the ipsilateral eye was dominant. Binocular stimulation resulted in a greater depth of modulation than did monocular stimulation of the dominant eye for 69% of the cells. 5. Monocular stimulation of the VA neurons revealed that the best axis for the contralateral eye was tilted back 11 degrees, on average, to the best axis for ipsilateral stimulation. For the H-135i neurons, the best axes for monocular stimulation of the two eyes were approximately the same. 6. By stimulating circumscribed portions of the monocular receptive fields of the H-135i neurons with alternating upward and downward largefield motion, it was revealed that the contralateral receptive fields were bipartite. Upward motion was preferred in the anterior 45 degrees of the contralateral field, and downward motion, was preferred in the central 90 degrees of the contralateral visual field.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8120604     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1993.70.6.2647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  11 in total

1.  Premotor neurons encode torsional eye velocity during smooth-pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Dora E Angelaki; J David Dickman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  An Array of Descending Visual Interneurons Encoding Self-Motion in Drosophila.

Authors:  Marie P Suver; Ainul Huda; Nicole Iwasaki; Steve Safarik; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Optic flow input to the hippocampal formation from the accessory optic system.

Authors:  D R Wylie; R G Glover; J D Aitchison
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Cerebellar tDCS Alters the Perception of Optic Flow.

Authors:  Jean-François Nankoo; Christopher R Madan; Omar Medina; Tyler Makepeace; Christopher L Striemer
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Topographic Organization of Inferior Olive Projections to the Zebrin II Stripes in the Pigeon Cerebellar Uvula.

Authors:  Iulia Craciun; Cristián Gutiérrez-Ibáñez; Jeremy R Corfield; Peter L Hurd; Douglas R Wylie
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.856

Review 6.  Visual-Cerebellar Pathways and Their Roles in the Control of Avian Flight.

Authors:  Douglas R Wylie; Cristián Gutiérrez-Ibáñez; Andrea H Gaede; Douglas L Altshuler; Andrew N Iwaniuk
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 7.  Cerebellar Modules and Their Role as Operational Cerebellar Processing Units: A Consensus paper [corrected].

Authors:  Richard Apps; Richard Hawkes; Sho Aoki; Fredrik Bengtsson; Amanda M Brown; Gang Chen; Timothy J Ebner; Philippe Isope; Henrik Jörntell; Elizabeth P Lackey; Charlotte Lawrenson; Bridget Lumb; Martijn Schonewille; Roy V Sillitoe; Ludovic Spaeth; Izumi Sugihara; Antoine Valera; Jan Voogd; Douglas R Wylie; Tom J H Ruigrok
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.847

8.  Selective processing of all rotational and translational optic flow directions in the zebrafish pretectum and tectum.

Authors:  Kun Wang; Julian Hinz; Väinö Haikala; Dierk F Reiff; Aristides B Arrenberg
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 7.431

9.  The effect of monocular occlusion on hippocampal c-Fos expression in domestic chicks (Gallus gallus).

Authors:  Anastasia Morandi-Raikova; Uwe Mayer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Processing of visual signals related to self-motion in the cerebellum of pigeons.

Authors:  Douglas R Wylie
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.