Literature DB >> 8120346

The politics of antismoking legislation.

P D Jacobson1, J Wasserman, K Raube.   

Abstract

To understand why some states have enacted relatively stringent laws to control smoking in public places while others have not, we examined the political evolution of tobacco control initiatives in six states: New York, Minnesota, Florida, Illinois, Texas, and Arizona. Taken together, the case studies demonstrate the difficulties inherent in enacting strong statewide tobacco control legislation. More important, several unmistakable themes emerge from these case studies, shedding light on the barriers to greater legislative success. These themes include the manner in which the legislative debate is framed by antismoking advocates and the tobacco industry, the relative dearth of leadership provided by medical and health organizations, the role of public opinion, and the complex interaction that exists between statewide antismoking legislation and local antismoking ordinances. Understanding how these issues affect legislative outcomes may help antismoking advocates enact future statewide tobacco control initiatives. It may also present lessons applicable to future battles over other public health legislation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8120346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law        ISSN: 0361-6878            Impact factor:   2.265


  25 in total

1.  The tobacco settlement: an analysis of newspaper coverage of a national policy debate, 1997-98.

Authors:  J C Lima; M Siegel
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  State laws on youth access to tobacco in the United States: measuring their extensiveness with a new rating system.

Authors:  M H Alciati; M Frosh; S B Green; R C Brownson; P H Fisher; R Hobart; A Roman; R C Sciandra; D M Shelton
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 3.  Boards of Health as venues for clean indoor air policy making.

Authors:  Joanna V Dearlove; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Economic effect of restaurant smoking restrictions on restaurant business in Massachusetts, 1992 to 1998.

Authors:  William J Bartosch; G C Pope
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Local enactment of tobacco control policies in Massachusetts.

Authors:  William J Bartosch; Gregory C Pope
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Political ideology and tobacco control.

Authors:  J E Cohen; N Milio; R G Rozier; R Ferrence; M J Ashley; A O Goldstein
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Opinion leaders' support for tobacco control policies and participation in tobacco control activities.

Authors:  K A Howard; T Rogers; B Howard-Pitney; J A Flora; G J Norman; K M Ribisl
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 8.  Development and destruction of the first state funded anti-smoking campaign in the USA.

Authors:  T H Tsoukalas; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  Town-level characteristics and smoking policy adoption in Massachusetts: are local restaurant smoking regulations fostering disparities in health protection?

Authors:  Margie Skeer; Sarah George; William L Hamilton; Debbie M Cheng; Michael Siegel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 10.  Social movements and human rights rhetoric in tobacco control.

Authors:  P D Jacobson; A Banerjee
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.552

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.