Literature DB >> 8119790

ERCP in the management of patients having laparoscopic cholecystectomy: re-appraising current indications.

A Quershi1, A Browne, A L Leahy, G Courtney, H Osborne, P J Broe, D Bouchier-Hayes.   

Abstract

This study assessed the ability of biochemical tests and ultrasound to predict the presence of ductal calculi, and thereby refine the indications for ERCP, in patients before or after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Thirteen of fifty-three patients investigated before laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and four of seventeen investigated after had stones confirmed at ERCP. The most sensitive indices for stones were raised serum alkaline phosphatase (0.76), aspartate transferase (0.75) and alanine transferase (0.76). The most specific indices were an abnormal ultrasound (0.92), raised serum amylase (0.78) and raised bilirubin (0.75). Serum bilirubin, amylase and ultrasound were all normal in twenty-seven patients and all of these had normal ERCPs. If patients with normal bilirubin, amylase and ultrasound were not referred for ERCP, no stones would have been overlooked and the number of ERCPs could have been reduced by 39%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8119790     DOI: 10.1007/bf03022585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  21 in total

Review 1.  Biliary concrements: the endoscopic approach.

Authors:  A R Rosseland; M Osnes
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1989 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Plea for selective operative cholangiography.

Authors:  A W Yip; W S Ng; W C Chow; T K Choi; K H Lam
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1991-02

3.  Identification of bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  W P Joyce; R Keane; G J Burke; M Daly; J Drumm; T J Egan; P V Delaney
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the Dundee technique.

Authors:  L K Nathanson; S Shimi; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J L Ponsky
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Coelioscopic cholecystectomy. Preliminary report of 36 cases.

Authors:  F Dubois; P Icard; G Berthelot; H Levard
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  A requiem for the routine operative cholangiogram.

Authors:  A Gerber
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1986-10

8.  ERCP in the assessment of patients with post-cholecystectomy syndrome: benefits and limitations.

Authors:  F Marotta; R Hada; P Morello; G Vitale; M Sasaki; F Ragno; K Ono
Journal:  Neth J Med       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 1.422

9.  Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective analysis of 100 initial patients.

Authors:  J H Peters; E C Ellison; J T Innes; J L Liss; K E Nichols; J M Lomano; S R Roby; M E Front; L C Carey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Appraisal of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  H A Graves; J F Ballinger; W J Anderson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.

Authors:  Bobby V M Dasari; Chuan Jin Tan; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; David J Martin; Gareth Kirk; Lloyd McKie; Tom Diamond; Mark A Taylor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-12-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.