Literature DB >> 8119227

A comparison of transhiatal and transthoracic resection for oesophageal carcinoma.

M Fok1, S Law, F Stipa, S Cheng, J Wong.   

Abstract

We compared the results of 327 transthoracic (TT) resections and 82 transhiatal (TH) resections for carcinoma of the oesophagus operated on between July 1982 and June 1991. Significantly more patients with carcinoma of the lower third of the oesophagus (54% versus 28%) and with increased pulmonary risks for surgery (61% versus 22%) were selected for the TH approach as compared with the TT approach. Results showed comparable intraoperative complications between the two groups. 5% of patients in the TH group required a thoracotomy for control of haemorrhage (3 patients) and repair of bronchial tear (1 patient) which occurred during the transmediastinal dissection. Postoperatively, mechanical ventilation requirement and complications involving the cardio-pulmonary systems were similar between the two groups. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 3% and 4%, respectively for the TH and TT patients (p = NS), whereas hoarseness occurred in 16% and 5%, respectively (p = 0.001). The 30-day mortality rates and hospital mortality rates were comparable between the two groups as were the overall survival rates. Our results suggested that while TH resection did not diminish the operative morbidity and mortality rates overall, it is appropriate for patients with increased pulmonary risks to be preferentially selected for this approach, and for tumours located in the upper and lower portion of the thoracic oesophagus where dissection of the tumour can be carried out mostly under vision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8119227     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1010427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  7 in total

1.  Mid-term outcomes of side-to-side stapled anastomosis in cervical esophagogastrostomy.

Authors:  Won-Min Jo; Jae Seung Shin; In Sung Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  Esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus in the elderly: results of current surgical management.

Authors:  R T Poon; S Y Law; K M Chu; F J Branicki; J Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Laparoscopic esophagectomy in the palliative treatment of advanced esophageal cancer after radiochemotherapy.

Authors:  A Del Genio; G Rossetti; V Napolitano; V Maffettone; A Renzi; L Brusciano; G Russo; G Del Genio
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Open transthoracic or transhiatal esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in terms of morbidity, mortality and survival.

Authors:  I Braghetto; A Csendes; G Cardemil; P Burdiles; O Korn; H Valladares
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophageal resection and gastric tube reconstruction: a prospective randomized trial comparing sutured neck anastomosis with stapled intrathoracic anastomosis.

Authors:  Bruno Walther; Jan Johansson; Folke Johnsson; Christer Staël Von Holstein; Thomas Zilling
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Impact of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  M Italo Braghetto; H Gonzalo Cardemil; B Carlos Mandiola; L Gonzalo Masia; S Francesca Gattini
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

7.  The impact of operative approach on outcome of surgery for gastro-oesophageal tumours.

Authors:  Stuart A Suttie; Alan Gk Li; Martha Quinn; Kenneth Gm Park
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 2.754

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.