Literature DB >> 8116728

Lymphadenectomy in stage I ovarian cancer.

E Petru1, M Lahousen, K Tamussino, H Pickel, H Stranzl, H Stettner, R Winter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our experience with systematic lymphadenectomy in stage I ovarian cancer (defined as intraabdominal disease confined to the ovaries) was reviewed. We analyzed whether it would be possible to predict lymph node metastases on the basis of clinical-morphologic factors at the time of surgery. STUDY
DESIGN: Forty of 100 evaluable patients operated on between 1980 and 1990 underwent comprehensive surgical staging, including total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, and systemic pelvic +/- paraaortic lymphadenectomy.
RESULTS: Nine of the 40 (23%) patients who underwent lymphadenectomy were found to have lymph node metastases; five of these were < or = 2 mm in maximum diameter. Four of the nine patients with positive nodes had ovarian tumors with a maximum diameter of only 5 cm, eight had grade 2 or 3 tumors, and eight tumors were classified as serous cystadenocarcinomas. Other clinical-morphologic factors such as ascites, adherence, or extracystic excrescences did not predict lymph node metastasis. Four of the nine patients with positive nodes survived > or = 5 years with no evidence of disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Lymph node metastases, some < r = 2 mm in diameter, occur in an appreciable percentage of patients with intraabdominal disease confined to the ovaries. Clinical-morphologic factors at surgery cannot be relied on to predict the status of the lymph nodes. Thus we cannot recommend limiting lymphadenectomy to any specific subgroup of patients with intraabdominal disease confined to the ovaries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8116728     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70244-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  16 in total

Review 1.  Current status and future strategies of cytoreductive surgery plus intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Authors:  Hassan-Alaa-Hammed Al-Shammaa; Yan Li; Yutaka Yonemura
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Management of retroperitoneal lymph nodes in the treatment of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Kimio Ushijima
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Clinical impact of systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for pT1 and pT2 ovarian cancer: a retrospective survey by the Sankai Gynecology Study Group.

Authors:  Takafumi Oshita; Hiroaki Itamochi; Ryuichiro Nishimura; Fumitaka Numa; Kazuhiro Takehara; Masamichi Hiura; Hirotoshi Tanimoto; Jun Noma; Ryoji Hayase; Akihiro Murakami; Hideo Fujimoto; Yasunobu Kanamori; Fuminori Kitada; Keiji Shitsukawa; Makoto Nagaji; Yukihisa Minagawa; Michihisa Fujiwara; Junzo Kigawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  What is the role of retroperitoneal exploration in optimally debulked stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer? An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group ancillary data study.

Authors:  Bunja J Rungruang; Austin Miller; Thomas C Krivak; Neil S Horowitz; Noah Rodriguez; Chad A Hamilton; Floor J Backes; Linda F Carson; Michael Friedlander; David G Mutch; Michael J Goodheart; Krishnansu S Tewari; Robert M Wenham; Michael A Bookman; G Larry Maxwell; Scott D Richard
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Operative management of primary epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Mario M Leitao; Dennis S Chi
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  Elevated expression of MAC30 predicts lymph node metastasis and unfavorable prognosis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Shanshan Yang; Huiyan Li; Yunduo Liu; Xiaoming Ning; Fanling Meng; Min Xiao; Deying Wang; Ge Lou; Yunyan Zhang
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.064

7.  Stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer classified solely by lymph node metastasis has a more favorable prognosis than other types of stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Su-Jin Baek; Jeong-Yeol Park; Dae-Yeon Kim; Jong-Hyeok Kim; Yong-Man Kim; Young-Tak Kim; Joo-Hyun Nam
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 8.  Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: is there a role of histology-specific treatment?

Authors:  Masashi Takano; Hiroshi Tsuda; Toru Sugiyama
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-06-01

9.  Prognostic impact of lymphadenectomy in clinically early stage malignant germ cell tumour of the ovary.

Authors:  H Mahdi; R E Swensen; R Hanna; S Kumar; R Ali-Fehmi; A Semaan; H Tamimi; R T Morris; A R Munkarah
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Prognostic factors in early-stage ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Germana Tognon; Mario Carnazza; Monica Ragnoli; Stefano Calza; Federico Ferrari; Angela Gambino; Valentina Zizioli; Sara Notaro; Benedetta Sostegni; Enrico Sartori
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2013-06-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.