Literature DB >> 8116715

The measurement of diastolic blood pressure during pregnancy: which Korotkoff phase should be used?

M C López1, J M Belizán, J Villar, E Bergel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the two Korotkoff phases, to estimate diastolic blood pressure during pregnancy. STUDY
DESIGN: A cohort of 1194 nulliparous pregnant women were followed up prospectively from the twentieth week of pregnancy until delivery. Blood pressure measurements were obtained with random-zero sphygmomanometers at 20, 23, 25, 27, 31, and 35 weeks and then weekly until delivery. After 10 minutes of rest five blood pressure measurements were obtained in each position: supine, lateral, and seated. Korotkoff phases IV and V were obtained in each measurement.
RESULTS: The frequency of 0 values was always < 0.5% (n = 10,501 in each time and position). Mean differences between both phases throughout pregnancy fluctuates around 6 mm Hg. Minor differences (mean 3.7 mm Hg) without outlier values were observed in women with diastolic hypertension. Phase 5 showed a better association with other outcome variables related to hypertension, such as proteinuria, intrauterine growth retardation, and hyperuricemia.
CONCLUSION: Considering that phase 5 is easier to obtain, its use implies very few 0 values, that the difference between the two Korotkoff phases is around 6 mm Hg, and that the association with hypertension-related complications is similar to that of phase 4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8116715     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70230-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  3 in total

1.  Measuring diastolic blood pressure in pregnancy.

Authors:  P Rubin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-07-06

2.  Report of the Canadian Hypertension Society Consensus Conference: 1. Definitions, evaluation and classification of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy.

Authors:  M E Helewa; R F Burrows; J Smith; K Williams; P Brain; S W Rabkin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-09-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Early prediction of preeclampsia.

Authors:  Leona C Poon; Kypros H Nicolaides
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2014-07-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.