Literature DB >> 8116578

Homogeneous sampling accounts for the increased diagnostic accuracy using the ThinPrep Processor.

M L Hutchinson1, L M Isenstein, A Goodman, A A Hurley, K L Douglass, K K Mui, F W Patten, D J Zahniser.   

Abstract

Recent clinical trials indicated that the ThinPrep method of sample preparation has greater diagnostic sensitivity than the conventional direct Papanicolaou smear. The authors hypothesized that nonhomogeneous cell sampling during transfer from the sampling device to the microscope slide was a contributing factor to the reduced accuracy of the conventional direct Pap smears in these trials. To test this hypothesis, four direct smear methods were compared with the newly developed, fluid-based, filter-transfer method. Counts of epithelial cells on conventional smears showed that only a fraction of the available epithelial cells on the sampling devices (medians, 6.5% to 62.5%) was actually deposited on the slides. In all 27 cases studied with the ThinPrep method, equivalent diagnostic material was obtained on each of the replicate slides prepared per specimen. This identifies a new source of error, preparation error, in conventional smears.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8116578     DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/101.2.215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  5 in total

1.  Comparable performance of conventional and liquid-based cytology in diagnosing anal intraepithelial neoplasia in HIV-infected and -uninfected Thai men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Nittaya Phanuphak; Nipat Teeratakulpisarn; Cherry Lim; Taweesak Changnam; Stephen Kerr; Amornrat Deesua; Piranun Hongchookiat; Piyanee Rodbamrung; Saranya Numto; Jiranuwat Barisri; Praphan Phanuphak; Somboon Keelawat; Annette H Sohn; Jintanat Ananworanich; Surang Triratanachat
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.731

2.  p16INK4A as a marker for cervical dyskaryosis: CIN and cGIN in cervical biopsies and ThinPrep smears.

Authors:  N Murphy; M Ring; A G Killalea; V Uhlmann; M O'Donovan; F Mulcahy; M Turner; E McGuinness; M Griffin; C Martin; O Sheils; J J O'Leary
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  Cervical cancer prevention--cervical screening: science in evolution.

Authors:  Mahboobeh Safaeian; Diane Solomon; Philip E Castle
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 4.  Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer.

Authors:  Eileen M Burd
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Barriers to adoption of recent technology in cervical screening.

Authors:  Darshana Jhala; Isam Eltoum
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 2.091

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.