Literature DB >> 8116080

Plasma D-dimer measurement as a marker of gynecologic tumors: comparison with Ca 125.

C Rella1, M Coviello, N De Frenza, G Falco, E Chiuri, P Colavito, M Quaranata, A De Leonardis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fibrin is formed and degraded intra-abdominally in ovarian cancer, and the cross-linked fibrin degradation product, D-dimer (D-D), has been found in increased concentrations in the plasma of these patients.
METHODS: D-dimer and Ca 125 levels were determined simultaneously in 110 patients with gynecologic neoplasms. D-dimer and Ca 125 assays were performed using the Dimertest Stripwell EIA Kit (Ortho) and CA 125-II EIA assay (Roche), respectively.
RESULTS: D-dimer plasma and Ca 125 serum levels were significantly higher in patients with ovarian cancer (mean +/- SE = 894.2 +/- 173.7 ng/ml and 760.5 +/- 292.7 U/ml, respectively) than in those with uterine cancer (mean DD +/- SE = 109.7 +/- 23.5 ng/ml and mean Ca 125 +/- SE = 50.0 +/- 23.1 U/ml) or those with benign disease (mean D-D +/- SE = 70.5 +/- 5.5 ng/ml and mean Ca 125 +/- SE = 6.6 +/- 2.8 U/ml). The levels of both markers increased with regard to ovarian cancer disease status. Mean D-D +/- SE was 90.0 +/- 22.8 ng/ml and mean Ca 125 +/- SE was 2.1 +/- 1.2 U/ml in patients with complete remission; mean D-D +/- SE was 143.3 +/- 33.5 ng/ml and mean Ca 125 +/- SE was 26.2 +/- 13.6 U/ml in patients with partial remission. In active disease, both markers had very high levels: D-D mean +/- SE = 1021.6 +/- 173.0 ng/ml and Ca 125 mean +/- SE = 1154.7 +/- 458.1 U/ml. In all groups of ovarian cancer patients, D-dimer sensitivity was better than that of Ca 125. In advanced ovarian cancer patients, the D-dimer concentration in ascites was up to 100 fold that in plasma.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that D-dimer can serve as a sensitive indicator to monitor the extent and course of the disease in ovarian cancer patients. The patient follow-up is ongoing to establish the predictive value of D-dimer measurement with respect to prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8116080     DOI: 10.1177/030089169307900513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tumori        ISSN: 0300-8916


  5 in total

1.  Plasma D-dimer level in patients with colorectal cancer: its role as a tumor marker.

Authors:  M Oya; Y Akiyama; T Yanagida; S Akao; H Ishikawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Coagulation tests show significant differences in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Faruk Tas; Leyla Kilic; Derya Duranyildiz
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-03-05

Review 3.  Clinical significance of plasma D-dimer in ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiacong Wu; Ziyi Fu; Guangquan Liu; Pengfei Xu; Juan Xu; Xuemei Jia
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  High Pretreatment Plasma D-dimer Levels Are Associated With Poor Prognosis in Patients With Ovarian Cancer Independently of Venous Thromboembolism and Tumor Extension.

Authors:  Manabu Sakurai; Toyomi Satoh; Koji Matsumoto; Hiroo Michikami; Yuko Nakamura; Sari Nakao; Hiroyuki Ochi; Mamiko Onuki; Takeo Minaguchi; Hiroyuki Yoshikawa
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.437

5.  D-Dimer and Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels: Useful Indicators for Predicting the Tumor Stage and Postoperative Survival.

Authors:  Kemal Tekeşin; Savaş Bayrak; Varol Esatoğlu; Ebru Özdemir; Leyla Özel; Veli Melih Kara
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 2.260

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.