BACKGROUND: Incidence cases of carcinoma of the cervix may be assumed as failures of a population-based cytologic screening program. Monitoring such cases would provide an estimate of screening effectiveness, and evaluating the causes of the failures would improve screening performance. STUDY DESIGN: All incident cases of cervicocarcinoma registered in 1988 and 1989 in the Tuscany Tumor Registry were eligible for the study and were reviewed. RESULTS: Sixty-nine eligible cases were considered. Non- or irregular attendance (negative smear-to-diagnosis interval > 5 years) for the Pap smear was recorded in 53 subjects. A false-negative smear (smear-to-diagnosis interval < 5 years) and refused or inadequate assessment/treatment at private practices or local hospitals were recorded in 12 cases. False-negative smears by the local screening program were recorded in 4 cases only. CONCLUSIONS: Non- or irregular attendance was the major cause of screening failures. Since cytologic screening or diagnostic assessment outside the screening program may be inadequate, central screening and follow-up is recommended. Non-attenders showed a strong negative attitude towards screening, and general practitioners and gynecologists need to be further stimulated for systematic screening promotion. Immediate evaluation of the screening history of incident cases of cervicocarcinoma should be mandatory in any screening program.
BACKGROUND: Incidence cases of carcinoma of the cervix may be assumed as failures of a population-based cytologic screening program. Monitoring such cases would provide an estimate of screening effectiveness, and evaluating the causes of the failures would improve screening performance. STUDY DESIGN: All incident cases of cervicocarcinoma registered in 1988 and 1989 in the Tuscany Tumor Registry were eligible for the study and were reviewed. RESULTS: Sixty-nine eligible cases were considered. Non- or irregular attendance (negative smear-to-diagnosis interval > 5 years) for the Pap smear was recorded in 53 subjects. A false-negative smear (smear-to-diagnosis interval < 5 years) and refused or inadequate assessment/treatment at private practices or local hospitals were recorded in 12 cases. False-negative smears by the local screening program were recorded in 4 cases only. CONCLUSIONS: Non- or irregular attendance was the major cause of screening failures. Since cytologic screening or diagnostic assessment outside the screening program may be inadequate, central screening and follow-up is recommended. Non-attenders showed a strong negative attitude towards screening, and general practitioners and gynecologists need to be further stimulated for systematic screening promotion. Immediate evaluation of the screening history of incident cases of cervicocarcinoma should be mandatory in any screening program.
Authors: A R Spence; A Alobaid; P Drouin; P Goggin; L Gilbert; D Provencher; P Tousignant; J A Hanley; E L Franco Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: P Giorgi Rossi; L M Marsili; L Camilloni; A Iossa; A Lattanzi; C Sani; C Di Pierro; G Grazzini; C Angeloni; P Capparucci; A Pellegrini; M L Schiboni; A Sperati; M Confortini; C Bellanova; A D'Addetta; E Mania; C B Visioli; E Sereno; F Carozzi Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-12-21 Impact factor: 7.640