Literature DB >> 8115617

Assessment of tumor infiltration depth in rectal cancer with transrectal sonography: caution is necessary.

F J Hulsmans1, T L Tio, P Fockens, A Bosma, G N Tytgat.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the depth of infiltration of rectal cancer with transrectal ultrasound (US) (TRUS) and analyze interpretation errors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-five consecutive patients with rectal cancer who underwent TRUS were prospectively studied. The effect of different patient inclusion criteria and US criteria was evaluated retrospectively.
RESULTS: Extensive overstaging of T2 tumors, partially caused by inflammatory (desmoplastic) reaction or retraction of the muscularis propria, resulted in a specificity of only 24% for detection of perirectal infiltration. Sensitivity was 97%, and accuracy was 64%. Considerable variation in staging accuracy was observed when different patient selection criteria were used. Variation of US criteria improved differentiation between T2 and T3 tumors only slightly.
CONCLUSION: The effect of different US criteria on differentiation of T2 and T3 tumors is limited. Spontaneous or iatrogenic inflammation is a major limiting factor. The accuracy of TRUS in staging rectal cancer is affected by patient inclusion criteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8115617     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.190.3.8115617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  22 in total

1.  Transrectal ultrasound: accurate staging for rectal cancer.

Authors:  W D Wong
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Multimodal imaging evaluation in staging of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Suk Hee Heo; Jin Woong Kim; Sang Soo Shin; Yong Yeon Jeong; Heoung-Keun Kang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in the loco-regional staging of patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Pietro Marone; Mario de Bellis; Valentina D'Angelo; Paolo Delrio; Valentina Passananti; Elena Di Girolamo; Giovanni Battista Rossi; Daniela Rega; Maura Claire Tracey; Alfonso Mario Tempesta
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-06-25

4.  Current trends in staging rectal cancer.

Authors:  Abdus Samee; Chelliah Ramachandran Selvasekar
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Multidisciplinary treatment of rectal cancer in 2014: where are we going?

Authors:  Andrea Vignali; Paola De Nardi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Role of preoperative CT colonography in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Lapo Sali; Massimo Falchini; Antonio Taddei; Mario Mascalchi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Sphincter preservation in rectal cancer.

Authors:  C G Willett
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2000-12

8.  Complete pathological response to bevacizumab and chemoradiation in advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Christopher G Willett; Dan G Duda; Emmanuelle di Tomaso; Yves Boucher; Brian G Czito; Zeljko Vujaskovic; Gordana Vlahovic; Johanna Bendell; Kenneth S Cohen; Herbert I Hurwitz; Rex Bentley; Gregory Y Lauwers; Martin Poleski; Terence Z Wong; Erik Paulson; Kirk A Ludwig; Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Oncol       Date:  2007-05

Review 9.  MRI in local staging of rectal cancer: an update.

Authors:  Umit Tapan; Mustafa Ozbayrak; Servet Tatlı
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.630

10.  Assessment of T staging and mesorectal fascia status using high-resolution MRI in rectal cancer with rectal distention.

Authors:  Sheng-Xiang Rao; Meng-Su Zeng; Jian-Ming Xu; Xin-Yu Qin; Cai-Zhong Chen; Ren-Chen Li; Ying-Yong Hou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.