Literature DB >> 8115609

Gender differences in vertebral body sizes in children and adolescents.

V Gilsanz1, M I Boechat, T F Roe, M L Loro, J W Sayre, W G Goodman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether differences in vertebral bone densities or sizes account for gender differences in skeletal mass during growth.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Quantitative computed tomography (CT) was used to measure the densities of cortical and cancellous bone and dimensions of the lumbar vertebral bodies in 196 healthy children and adolescents, ages 4-20 years.
RESULTS: Neither cancellous nor cortical bone densities differed between boys and girls with age or level of sexual development. In contrast, the cross-sectional areas of the vertebral bodies were greater in boys than girls throughout childhood and adolescence. Even when prepubertal children were matched for chronologic age, bone age, height, and weight, the size of the vertebral bodies was 17% greater in boys. This disparity in vertebral body size increased with level of sexual development and was greatest at sexual maturity.
CONCLUSION: Lower vertebral bone mass of women as compared with men may result from early gender differences in the sizes of bones rather than differences in bone densities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8115609     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.190.3.8115609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  32 in total

1.  The influence of sex, age and BMI on the degeneration of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Lisa A Zukowski; Anthony B Falsetti; Mark D Tillman
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Interaction between playing golf and HRT on vertebral bone properties in post-menopausal women measured by QCT.

Authors:  P Eser; J Cook; J Black; R Iles; R M Daly; R Ptasznik; S L Bass
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  The role of spinal concave-convex biases in the progression of idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Mark Driscoll; Carl-Eric Aubin; Alain Moreau; Isabelle Villemure; Stefan Parent
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Time dependency of bone density estimation from computed tomography with intravenous contrast agent administration.

Authors:  K Acu; M Scheel; A S Issever
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Bone health and the female athlete triad in adolescent athletes.

Authors:  Kathryn E Ackerman; Madhusmita Misra
Journal:  Phys Sportsmed       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.241

6.  Quantitative computed tomography for measuring bone mineral density in athletes.

Authors:  H Dinç; G Savci; A Demirci; M Y Sadikoğlu; E Tuncel; H Yavuz
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 7.  Vertebral cross-sectional area: an orphan phenotype with potential implications for female spinal health.

Authors:  T A L Wren; S Ponrartana; V Gilsanz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Gender differences in volumetric bone density: a study of opposite-sex twins.

Authors:  Vasi Naganathan; Philip Sambrook
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Pubertal bone growth in the femoral neck is predominantly characterized by increased bone size and not by increased bone density--a 4-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  M Sundberg; P Gärdsell; O Johnell; E Ornstein; M K Karlsson; I Sernbo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-29       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Pediatric bone density and fracture.

Authors:  Emily von Scheven
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.