Literature DB >> 8115234

Recognition of animal locomotion from dynamic point-light displays.

G Mather1, S West.   

Abstract

To date, studies of biological motion have been restricted to displays of humans filmed (or synthesised by computer) with lights attached at the major joints. Observers can readily extract meaning from such displays. There have been no studies to assess the generality of this ability by assessing observers' accuracy in identifying various animals solely on the basis of biological motion. An experiment is reported for which biological-motion displays were created from the stop-action photographs taken by Muybridge in the last century. Naive observers could reliably identify the animals involved when biological-motion displays were animated, but not when they were given static views of dot positions. Thus the ability to interpret biological motion is general and is not restricted to human movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8115234     DOI: 10.1068/p220759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  10 in total

1.  The analysis of complex motion patterns by form/cue invariant MSTd neurons.

Authors:  B J Geesaman; R A Andersen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Biological motion cues trigger reflexive attentional orienting.

Authors:  Jinfu Shi; Xuchu Weng; Sheng He; Yi Jiang
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-09-29

3.  A New Qualitative Typology to Classify Treading Water Movement Patterns.

Authors:  Christophe Schnitzler; Chris Button; James L Croft; Ludovic Seifert
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby.

Authors:  Francesca Simion; Lucia Regolin; Hermann Bulf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Bird expertise does not increase motion sensitivity to bird flight motion.

Authors:  Simen Hagen; Quoc C Vuong; Michael D Chin; Lisa S Scott; Tim Curran; James W Tanaka
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Comparing biological motion perception in two distinct human societies.

Authors:  Pierre Pica; Stuart Jackson; Randolph Blake; Nikolaus F Troje
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Biological motion stimuli are attractive to medaka fish.

Authors:  Tomohiro Nakayasu; Eiji Watanabe
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2013-10-20       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Individual differences in the perception of biological motion and fragmented figures are not correlated.

Authors:  Eunice L Jung; Asieh Zadbood; Sang-Hun Lee; Andrew J Tomarken; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-10-30

9.  Combining Computational and Social Effort for Collaborative Problem Solving.

Authors:  Mark D Wagy; Josh C Bongard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The neural representation of human versus nonhuman bipeds and quadrupeds.

Authors:  Liuba Papeo; Moritz F Wurm; Nikolaas N Oosterhof; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.