Literature DB >> 8114181

Long-term follow-up for recurrent stenosis: a prospective randomized study of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch angioplasty versus primary closure after carotid endarterectomy.

D Katz1, S O Snyder, R H Gandhi, J R Wheeler, R T Gregory, R G Gayle, F N Parent.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of primary closure (PC) versus expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch graft angioplasty (PGA) on the incidence of recurrent stenosis (> 50% lumen diameter narrowing) after carotid endarterectomy (CEA), 87 patients undergoing 100 consecutive CEA were prospectively randomized into two groups.
METHODS: Forty-four patients underwent 51 PC, and 43 patients underwent 49 PGA. All patients were evaluated after operation by duplex scanning at 1.5, 12, 24, and 36 months. There were no significant differences in the demographic characteristics or operative indications for CEA between the two patient groups. Complete follow-up was achieved in 86% (75/87) of the patients during the 36-month surveillance period.
RESULTS: The perioperative permanent neurologic morbidity in the PC and PGA groups was noted to be 4% and 2%, respectively (PC = 2/51 vs PGA = 1/49, p = 0.58). Three additional reversible cerebral ischemic events occurred in the postoperative period (PC = 2/51 vs PGA = 1/49, p = 0.58). Other morbidity included immediate postoperative hemorrhage requiring reexploration (1/51) in the PC group and an infected expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch requiring removal and replacement with autogenous vein (1/49). Long-term follow-up detected a single patient with significant bilateral restenoses of his primarily closed carotid arteries. None of the patients in the PGA group had restenoses (PC = 2/51 vs 0/49, p = 0.50). In addition, no postoperative dilation of the common or internal carotid arteries or perioperative death was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing CEA, these data demonstrate no significant difference in the perioperative morbidity or mortality between PC and PGA. Use of the patch did not engender patients to patch rupture or aneurysmal degeneration as previously described with vein patch angioplasty procedures. This series supports effective use of either technique to achieve minimal rates of restenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8114181     DOI: 10.1016/s0741-5214(94)70095-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  14 in total

1.  Prospective randomized trial of ACUSEAL versus Vascu-Guard patching in carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Patrick A Stone; Ali F AbuRahma; Albeir Y Mousa; David Phang; Stephen M Hass; Asmita Modak; David Dearing
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 1.466

2.  A prospective randomized study on bilateral carotid endarterectomy: patching versus eversion.

Authors:  E Ballotta; L Renon; G Da Giau; A Toniato; C Baracchini; E Abbruzzese; M Saladini; P Moscardo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Effect of patching on reducing restenosis in the carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial.

Authors:  Mahmoud Malas; Natalia O Glebova; Susan E Hughes; Jenifer H Voeks; Umair Qazi; Wesley S Moore; Brajesh K Lal; George Howard; Rafael Llinas; Thomas G Brott
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 4.  Patch angioplasty versus primary closure for carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Saritphat Orrapin; Thoetphum Benyakorn; Boonying Siribumrungwong; Kittipan Rerkasem
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-08-03

5.  Outcomes of Carotid Endarterectomy with Primary Closure.

Authors:  Ivy Cheng; Krishna S Vyas; Santhosh Velaga; Daniel L Davenport; Sibu P Saha
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2017-03-14

Review 6.  Comparative Review of the Treatment Methodologies of Carotid Stenosis.

Authors:  Coney Bae; Mauricio Szuchmacher; John B Chang
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2015-05-18

7.  Primary closure after a carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Dong-Ik Kim; Ji-Young Moon; Chul-Hyung Lee; Do-Yool Kim; Young-Sam Jang; Gyeong-Moon Kim; Chin-Sang Chung; Kwang-Ho Lee; Seon-Woo Kim
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 8.  Carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty versus primary closure in patients with symptomatic and significant stenosis: a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Martijn S Marsman; Jørn Wetterslev; Abdelkarime Kh Jahrome; Christian Gluud; Frans L Moll; Frederik Keus; Giel G Koning
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-06

Review 9.  Patch angioplasty versus primary closure for carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Kittipan Rerkasem; Peter M Rothwell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-10-07

10.  Patch variability following carotid endarterectomy: a survey of Great Britain and Ireland.

Authors:  G J Harrison; J A Brennan; J B Naik; S R Vallabhaneni; R K Fisher
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.