OBJECTIVES: Patients with angina often report that symptoms are worse in cold weather. This study was designed to determine differences between cold-tolerant and cold-intolerant patients in the hemodynamic and ischemic response to exercise at cold temperatures and to assess the role of catecholamines and baroreceptor function. BACKGROUND: Studies have suggested that the heart rate response may differ at cold temperatures, but the mechanism and role of this variation have not been examined. METHODS: Seven cold-intolerant and seven cold-tolerant patients with angina underwent exercise treadmill testing at 6 and 25 degrees C with measurement of catecholamines. Baroreceptor function was assessed by the decrease in systolic blood pressure after patients stood up from the supine position. RESULTS: Norepinephrine levels increased by 139% in the cold environment, but there were no differences between cold-intolerant and cold-tolerant patients. Consequently, blood pressure was higher in the cold environment in all patients, but the heart rate response was similar. However, cold-intolerant patients had a steeper heart rate response in the cold and developed ischemia (mean [+/- SEM] 201 +/- 58 vs. 242 +/- 50 s, p = 0.05) and angina (348 +/- 87 vs. 449 +/- 60 s, p = 0.04) earlier in the cold environment, a difference not seen in the cold-tolerant patients. Baroreceptor function was impaired in cold-intolerant patients (decrease in systolic blood pressure after patients stood up from the supine position 19 +/- 7 vs. 0 +/- 4 mm Hg, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to cold causes an increase in blood pressure with an associated increase in myocardial oxygen demand in all patients. In cold-tolerant patients, this increase may be offset by a reduction in heart rate if baroreceptor function is normal. If baroreceptor function is abnormal, heart rate may not decrease in response to a cold-induced increase in blood pressure. This mechanism may account for some of the variability in tolerance to cold exposure that affects patients with exertional angina.
OBJECTIVES:Patients with angina often report that symptoms are worse in cold weather. This study was designed to determine differences between cold-tolerant and cold-intolerant patients in the hemodynamic and ischemic response to exercise at cold temperatures and to assess the role of catecholamines and baroreceptor function. BACKGROUND: Studies have suggested that the heart rate response may differ at cold temperatures, but the mechanism and role of this variation have not been examined. METHODS: Seven cold-intolerant and seven cold-tolerant patients with angina underwent exercise treadmill testing at 6 and 25 degrees C with measurement of catecholamines. Baroreceptor function was assessed by the decrease in systolic blood pressure after patients stood up from the supine position. RESULTS:Norepinephrine levels increased by 139% in the cold environment, but there were no differences between cold-intolerant and cold-tolerant patients. Consequently, blood pressure was higher in the cold environment in all patients, but the heart rate response was similar. However, cold-intolerant patients had a steeper heart rate response in the cold and developed ischemia (mean [+/- SEM] 201 +/- 58 vs. 242 +/- 50 s, p = 0.05) and angina (348 +/- 87 vs. 449 +/- 60 s, p = 0.04) earlier in the cold environment, a difference not seen in the cold-tolerant patients. Baroreceptor function was impaired in cold-intolerant patients (decrease in systolic blood pressure after patients stood up from the supine position 19 +/- 7 vs. 0 +/- 4 mm Hg, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to cold causes an increase in blood pressure with an associated increase in myocardial oxygen demand in all patients. In cold-tolerant patients, this increase may be offset by a reduction in heart rate if baroreceptor function is normal. If baroreceptor function is abnormal, heart rate may not decrease in response to a cold-induced increase in blood pressure. This mechanism may account for some of the variability in tolerance to cold exposure that affects patients with exertional angina.
Authors: Matthew D Muller; Zhaohui Gao; Patrick M McQuillan; Urs A Leuenberger; Lawrence I Sinoway Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Matthew D Muller; Zhaohui Gao; Hardikkumar M Patel; Matthew J Heffernan; Urs A Leuenberger; Lawrence I Sinoway Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2014-01-17 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Jone Vencloviene; Ruta Marija Babarskiene; Paulius Dobozinskas; Audrius Dedele; Kristina Lopatiene; Nijole Ragaisyte Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2017-05-10 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Philippe Meyer; Thibaut Guiraud; Daniel Curnier; Martin Juneau; Mathieu Gayda; Anna Nozza; Anil Nigam Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: Rajesh Janardhanan; Zachary Henry; David J Hur; Christine M Lin; David Lopez; Patrick M Reagan; Sean R Rudnick; Travis J Koshko; Ellen C Keeley Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2010-08-15 Impact factor: 2.778