Literature DB >> 8112733

Maternal cell contamination in amniotic fluid samples as a consequence of the sampling technique.

S Nuss1, D Brebaum, C Grond-Ginsbach.   

Abstract

Maternal cell contamination in amniotic fluid samples is easily detected by in situ hybridization if the karyotype of the fetus differs from the karyotype of the mother. One out of two amniotic fluid samples appears to contain more than 20% maternal cells. Bloody samples often contain even more than 50% maternal cells. Maternal cells can also be identified on the basis of their nuclear morphology. Maternal cell contamination is regularly observed in pregnancies with an anterior placenta, whereas it is rare in posterior placenta pregnancies. The maternal cells are therefore thought to be artificially introduced into the amniotic fluid sample, as a result of placental bleeding during amniocentesis. The implications of maternal cell contamination for prenatal diagnosis using uncultured amniotic fluid samples are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8112733     DOI: 10.1007/bf00210594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  17 in total

1.  Rapid detection of chromosome aneuploidies in uncultured amniocytes by using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

Authors:  K Klinger; G Landes; D Shook; R Harvey; L Lopez; P Locke; T Lerner; R Osathanondh; B Leverone; T Houseal
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Prenatal diagnosis with repetitive in situ hybridization probes.

Authors:  R V Lebo; R R Flandermeyer; R Diukman; E D Lynch; J A Lepercq; M S Golbus
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1992-07-15

3.  Multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization for the simultaneous detection of probe sets for chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y in uncultured amniotic fluid cells.

Authors:  T Ried; G Landes; W Dackowski; K Klinger; D C Ward
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 4.  DNA sequence localization in metaphase and interphase cells by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  B J Trask
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.441

5.  Prenatal diagnosis with biotinylated chromosome specific probes.

Authors:  B Guyot; A Bazin; Y Sole; C Julien; F Daffos; F Forestier
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  Rapid prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal aneuploidies by fluorescence in situ hybridization: clinical experience with 4,500 specimens.

Authors:  B E Ward; S L Gersen; M P Carelli; N M McGuire; W R Dackowski; M Weinstein; C Sandlin; R Warren; K W Klinger
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Efficacy and applicability of interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization for prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  S Schwartz
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  United States survey on chromosome mosaicism and pseudomosaicism in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  L Y Hsu; T E Perlis
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.050

9.  European collaborative study on prenatal diagnosis: mosaicism, pseudomosaicism and single abnormal cells in amniotic fluid cell cultures.

Authors:  T H Bui; L Iselius; J Lindsten
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.050

10.  Cloning of human satellite III DNA: different components are on different chromosomes.

Authors:  H J Cooke; J Hindley
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1979-07-25       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  1 in total

1.  Interpretation of amniotic fluid white blood cell count in "bloody tap" amniocenteses in women with symptoms of preterm labor.

Authors:  Sonya S Abdel-Razeq; Irina A Buhimschi; Mert O Bahtiyar; Victor A Rosenberg; Antonette T Dulay; Christina S Han; Erika F Werner; Stephen Thung; Catalin S Buhimschi
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 7.661

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.