Literature DB >> 8112068

The efficacy of a moisturizer (Locobase) among cleaners and kitchen assistants during everyday exposure to water and detergents.

L Halkier-Sørensen1, K Thestrup-Pedersen.   

Abstract

Workers exposed to various irritants are widely advised to use moisturizers. To evaluate the efficacy of a moisturizer (Locobase), we studied 111 cleaners and kitchen workers during everyday exposure to water and detergents. All took part in a standardized interview. After randomization, 1/2 the workers (n = 56) used Locobase during a period of 2 weeks (period L), followed by a period without any emollient (period C), or vice versa (n = 55). Clinical assessment and measurements of the skin surface temperature, electrical capacitance and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) were performed on the fingers, hands and arms on entry to the study, after 2 weeks and 4 weeks, or at drop out. The final evaluation showed that 70 (63%) were able to complete the study; 23 (21%) completed period L, but withdrew from period C after a mean of 6 days because of progressive dryness of the skin and eczema; and 12 (11%) were excluded because they used topical corticosteroids or emollients. The remaining 6 (5%) participants were lost to follow-up. Clinically, we observed a significant increase in dryness (p < 0.001) during periods of no treatment (period C), and normalization of the skin texture during use of Locobase. Clinical observations were confirmed by statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) in the electrical capacitance (epidermal hydration), which decreased during period C and increased to pre-study values during period L. No significant differences were found in skin temperatures and TEWL rates.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8112068     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1993.tb03563.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  7 in total

Review 1.  Skin-conditioning products in occupational dermatology.

Authors:  P Elsner; W Wigger-Alberti
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 2.  Current concepts of irritant contact dermatitis.

Authors:  J S C English
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 3.  Problems with trials and intervention studies on barrier creams and emollients at the workplace.

Authors:  Peter-Jan Coenraads; Thomas L Diepgen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-05-24       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 4.  Interventions for preventing occupational irritant hand dermatitis.

Authors:  Andrea Bauer; Henriette Rönsch; Peter Elsner; Daan Dittmar; Cathy Bennett; Marie-Louise A Schuttelaar; Judit Lukács; Swen Malte John; Hywel C Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-04-30

5.  How irritant are n-propanol and isopropanol? - A systematic review.

Authors:  Ramona Tasar; Cornelia Wiegand; Peter Elsner
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 6.600

6.  Protocol for a randomised trial on the effect of group education on skin-protective behaviour versus treatment as usual among individuals with newly notified occupational hand eczema - the Prevention of Hand Eczema (PREVEX) Trial.

Authors:  Maja Hvid Fisker; Tove Agner; Jane Lindschou; Jens Peter Bonde; Kristina Sophie Ibler; Christian Gluud; Per Winkel; Niels E Ebbehøj
Journal:  BMC Dermatol       Date:  2013-11-19

7.  A novel dermo-cosmetic product containing thermal spring water, sucralfate, copper sulfate, and zinc sulfate in the management of hand eczema.

Authors:  Virginie Ribet; Ewa Mielewczyk; Anne Sirvent; Victor Georgescu; Ana Beatris Rossi
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2018-07-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.