Literature DB >> 8110920

Selective attention and brainstem frequency-following responses.

G C Galbraith1, C Arroyo.   

Abstract

In the auditory system, cortical event-related potential amplitudes are enhanced during selective attention within the auditory channel. In the case of brainstem responses, however, the results are less clear since only a few studies have reported attention effects. Nearly all of these studies have used click stimuli to elicit the brainstem auditory evoked response (BAER). In the present study, pure tones (200 and 400 Hz) elicited the brainstem frequency-following response (FFR) in a task that maximized channel separation by presenting different frequencies to each ear. Twelve male and 12 female subjects participated. Perceptual sensitivity (d') showed an overall right ear advantage (REA) that did not depend on gender or stimulus frequency. FFR averages were enhanced by digital filtering, the 25 ms response was partitioned in half, and quantified by fast-Fourier analysis. Results of the statistical analysis showed a significant Attention x Frequency x Half interaction. Thus, whether or not component amplitudes were larger during attention depended on the particular stimulus and temporal location within the FFR. These results are more complex and time variant than would be predicted by the hypothesis that attention only enhances evoked response amplitudes. Nevertheless, these results suggest that some form of attention-related modulation may be occurring at the level of the brainstem. The present results provide additional support for a peripheral gating mechanism in humans, which has been claimed in a minority of BAER studies. The FFR may provide additional useful information since it presumably depends on phase-locking neural elements, rather than on-units activated by acoustic transients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8110920     DOI: 10.1016/0301-0511(93)90024-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  11 in total

Review 1.  Evidence against attentional state modulating scalp-recorded auditory brainstem steady-state responses.

Authors:  Leonard Varghese; Hari M Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Processing Complex Sounds Passing through the Rostral Brainstem: The New Early Filter Model.

Authors:  John E Marsh; Tom A Campbell
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  Cortical Correlates of the Auditory Frequency-Following and Onset Responses: EEG and fMRI Evidence.

Authors:  Emily B J Coffey; Gabriella Musacchia; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Auditory brain stem response to complex sounds: a tutorial.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  The frequency following response (FFR) may reflect pitch-bearing information but is not a direct representation of pitch.

Authors:  Hedwig E Gockel; Robert P Carlyon; Anahita Mehta; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-09

6.  Speech perception as an active cognitive process.

Authors:  Shannon L M Heald; Howard C Nusbaum
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-17

7.  Selective attention modulates human auditory brainstem responses: relative contributions of frequency and spatial cues.

Authors:  Alexandre Lehmann; Marc Schönwiesner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Contributions of Sensory Coding and Attentional Control to Individual Differences in Performance in Spatial Auditory Selective Attention Tasks.

Authors:  Lengshi Dai; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 9.  Auditory-cortex short-term plasticity induced by selective attention.

Authors:  Iiro P Jääskeläinen; Jyrki Ahveninen
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 3.599

10.  Attentional Modulation of Envelope-Following Responses at Lower (93-109 Hz) but Not Higher (217-233 Hz) Modulation Rates.

Authors:  Emma Holmes; David W Purcell; Robert P Carlyon; Hedwig E Gockel; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-10-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.