Literature DB >> 8109509

Detection of gastroesophageal reflux: value of barium studies compared with 24-hr pH monitoring.

J K Thompson1, R E Koehler, J E Richter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Monitoring of esophageal pH is widely held to be the most sensitive test for gastroesophageal reflux, but it is expensive and is not available in all centers. Controversy surrounds the role of barium studies in the detection of reflux despite years of experience with their use. We studied the efficacy of fluoroscopic detection of spontaneous and provoked gastroesophageal reflux compared with 24-hr monitoring of esophageal pH. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In 117 subjects with clinical findings suggestive of gastroesophageal reflux, we recorded fluoroscopic observations of spontaneous reflux and of reflux elicited by coughing, the Valsalva maneuver, rolling from supine to the right lateral position, and the water-siphon test. Subjects were considered to have reflux if 24-hr monitoring of esophageal pH within 14 days of the barium examination showed esophageal pH to be less than 4 for intervals exceeding the 95th percentile values previously reported for a control group.
RESULTS: Barium studies showed unprovoked, spontaneous reflux in 26% of subjects proved by pH measurements to have gastroesophageal reflux. When the water-siphon test was used, the sensitivity of fluoroscopic detection rose to 70%, with a specificity of 74% and positive predictive value of 80%. Clinically significant reflux was detected radiographically in five patients in whom it was not detected by pH monitoring.
CONCLUSION: These data are contrary to prior reports and indicate that barium studies are useful for screening patients with clinical findings suggestive of gastroesophageal reflux. The sensitivity of barium studies is highest when maneuvers are used to elicit reflux.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8109509     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.162.3.8109509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  12 in total

1.  What is heartburn worth? A cost-utility analysis of management strategies.

Authors:  G R Heudebert; R M Centor; J C Klapow; R Marks; L Johnson; C M Wilcox
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Reflux of nasopharyngeal content into middle ear through the eustachian tube.

Authors:  Elif Ayanoglu; Cuneyd Uneri; Turgut Turoglu; Varlik Dogan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2003-11-18       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  The laryngeal and esophageal manifestations of Sjögren's syndrome.

Authors:  Peter C Belafsky; Gregory N Postma
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.592

4.  Barium study associated with water siphon test in gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complications.

Authors:  E Fiorentino; F Barbiera; D Cabibi; G Pantuso; S Bonventre; A Aiello; S Latteri; T D'Agostino
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Late follow-up in patients with gastroschisis : Gastroesophageal reflux is common.

Authors:  G Fasching; A Huber; E Uray; E Sorantin; J Mayr
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  EAES recommendations for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Karl Hermann Fuchs; Benjamin Babic; Wolfram Breithaupt; Bernard Dallemagne; Abe Fingerhut; Edgar Furnee; Frank Granderath; Peter Horvath; Peter Kardos; Rudolph Pointner; Edoardo Savarino; Maud Van Herwaarden-Lindeboom; Giovanni Zaninotto
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  A Comparative Assessment of the Diagnosis of Swallowing Impairment and Gastroesophageal Reflux in Canines and Humans.

Authors:  Tarini V Ullal; Stanley L Marks; Peter C Belafsky; Jeffrey L Conklin; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-06-09

8.  Correlation of radiographic and manometric findings in patients with ineffective esophageal motility.

Authors:  J S Shakespear; D Blom; J E Huprich; J H Peters
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD).

Authors:  Danisa M Clarrett; Christine Hachem
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2018 May-Jun

Review 10.  Gastroesophageal reflux disease in 2006. The imperfect diagnosis.

Authors:  John T Boyle
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.