Literature DB >> 8109281

Preliminary results of a randomized study on the clinical efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for refractory severe angina pectoris.

M J de Jongste1, M J Staal.   

Abstract

For the last 6 years Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) has been advocated for patients with therapeutic refractory angina pectoris. We studied the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation on the relief of otherwise intractable angina pectoris in a 2 months' randomized study with 1 year follow-up by quality of life parameters, cardiac parameters and complications. Twenty four patients were randomized to either an actively treated group A (12 patients received the device within a 2 weeks' period) or a control group B (10 patients had an implantation after the study period). In both groups one patient dropped out before the implantation but after the randomization. It is concluded that spinal cord stimulation improves both quality of life and cardiac parameters. The latter included a trend towards reduction in ischaemia after implantation of the device in both treadmill exercise and 24-hour ambulatory Holter recordings, with a concomitant better exercise capacity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8109281     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-9297-9_37

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien)


  3 in total

1.  Spinal cord stimulation versus other therapies in patients with Refractory Angina: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shaocheng Wang; Qixian Li; Hongwei Fang; Hao Yang; Diansan Su; Yuan-Xiang Tao; Zhankui Wang; Xiangrui Wang; Zhongwei Yang
Journal:  Transl Perioper Pain Med       Date:  2017

2.  Spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of refractory angina: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Rod S Taylor; Jessica De Vries; Eric Buchser; Mike J L Dejongste
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 2.298

3.  Clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis of an open label, single-centre, randomised trial of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) versus percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation (PMR) in patients with refractory angina pectoris: The SPiRiT trial.

Authors:  M T Dyer; K A Goldsmith; S N Khan; L D Sharples; C Freeman; I Hardy; M J Buxton; P M Schofield
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 2.279

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.