Literature DB >> 8109113

Minicholecystectomy vs conventional cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized trial--implications in the laparoscopic era.

A Assalia1, M Schein, D Kopelman, M Hashmonai.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare results of elective "open" conventional cholecystectomy (CC) to those of minicholecystectomy (MC). A clinical prospective, randomized trial was designed. The setting was an academic general surgical unit. In the CC group were 26 patients; in the MC group were 24 patients. In the CC group a conventional open cholecystectomy was performed through a subcostal incision; in the MC group operation through an initial 5-cm subcostal incision was done. Mean length of wound was 14.4 cm and 5.4 cm in the two groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Mean operative time was 60 and 59 minutes, respectively. Mean operative difficulty, estimated on a 1-10 scale, was 3.4 and 5.6, respectively (p < 0.05). Mean postoperative analgesia requirements (number of doses of 10 mg morphine sulphate) were 5.8 and 4.0, respectively (p = 0.002). Mean duration of hospitalization was 4.7 and 3.0 days, respectively (p < 0.001). Mean "overall patient satisfaction," estimated on 1-10 scale, was 6 and 8.3, respectively (p = 0.002). We conclude that Minicholecystectomy offers less pain, earlier recovery, and better cosmetic results than the conventional "open" procedure. Published results of MC compare favorably with those of laparoscopic procedures. The implications of these results in the "laparoscopic era" are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8109113     DOI: 10.1007/bf01659087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  18 in total

1.  Cholecystectomy through a 5 cm subcostal incision.

Authors:  P J O'Dwyer; J J Murphy; N J O'Higgins
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Minimal trauma cholecystectomy (a "no-touch" procedure in a "well").

Authors:  J R Merrill
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  Cystic duct remnants and biliary symptoms after cholecystectomy. A randomised comparison of two operative techniques.

Authors:  G Jonson; D M Nilsson; T Nilsson
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1991-10

4.  Endoscopic cholecystectomy. An analysis of complications.

Authors:  B M Wolfe; B N Gardiner; B F Leary; C F Frey
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1991-10

5.  Conventional versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the randomized controlled trial. Cholecystectomy Study Group.

Authors:  E Neugebauer; H Troidl; W Spangenberger; A Dietrich; R Lefering
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 6.  Cholecystectomy: the gold standard.

Authors:  C K McSherry
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 7.  New trends in gallstone management.

Authors:  S Cheslyn-Curtis; R C Russell
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Outpatient open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  E C Saltzstein; L C Mercer; J B Peacock; S H Dougherty
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1992-03

9.  [Minicholecystectomy].

Authors:  J G Stage; N C Hjortsø; J B Dahl; B Damgaard; B Hansen; H Kehlet
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  1991-11-11

10.  The improving results of cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J Pickleman; R P González
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1986-08
View more
  6 in total

1.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study.

Authors:  A Ros; L Gustafsson; H Krook; C E Nordgren; A Thorell; G Wallin; E Nilsson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Recovery of fasted and fed gastrointestinal motility after open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in dogs.

Authors:  M Hotokezaka; M J Combs; E P Mentis; B D Schirmer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Mini-cholecystectomy: a personal series in acute and chronic cholecystitis.

Authors:  P Watanapa
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 4.  Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.

Authors:  F Keus; J A F de Jong; H G Gooszen; C J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

Review 5.  Small-incision versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.

Authors:  F Keus; J A F de Jong; H G Gooszen; C J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

6.  Non-randomised patients in a cholecystectomy trial: characteristics, procedures, and outcomes.

Authors:  Axel Ros; Per Carlsson; Mikael Rahmqvist; Karin Bäckman; Erik Nilsson
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2006-12-26       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.