Literature DB >> 8108275

Antigenotoxic properties of lactic acid bacteria in the S. typhimurium mutagenicity assay.

B L Pool-Zobel1, R Münzner, W H Holzapfel.   

Abstract

A high percentage of human tumors is reported to be related to dietary habits. One way to improve the nutritional impact is to increase the intake of protective factors, such as inhibitors of DNA damage and other types of anticarcinogens. Specific strains of lactic acid bacteria used to ferment milk are promising candidates that may be antimutagenic and anticarcinogenic. We have studied the antimutagenicity of 10 isolated strains of beneficial lactic acid bacteria. Four types of fermented milk products were also studied for their protective properties. The effect of these bacteria on the yield of revertants induced by nitrosated beef extract was investigated in the Salmonella typhimurium mutagenicity assay. Eight of 10 isolated Lactobacillus strains reduced the yield of his+ revertants almost back to the levels of the untreated controls. Different fermented fresh yogurts containing viable bacteria (probably Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus or Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacteria) showed protective effects as well. The degree of suppressing revertants was independent of the yogurt's fat content. In contrast, yogurt products that had been heat treated were not inhibitory. The other fresh fermented milk products (e.g., buttermilk, kefir, and "Dickmilch") were not antimutagenic in this study. The results imply that some bacteria used in milk processing have an antimutagenic potential and that this property is specific for the bacterial strain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8108275     DOI: 10.1080/01635589309514294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutr Cancer        ISSN: 0163-5581            Impact factor:   2.900


  7 in total

1.  Antimutagenicity of milk fermented by Enterococcus faecium.

Authors:  A Belicová; J Krajcovic; J Dobias; L Ebringer
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.099

2.  Microbial Metabolites as Molecular Mediators of Host-Microbe Symbiosis in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  N P Hyland; A Houston; J M Keane; S A Joyce; C G M Gahan
Journal:  Results Probl Cell Differ       Date:  2020

Review 3.  A potential role of probiotics in colorectal cancer prevention: review of possible mechanisms of action.

Authors:  Esther Swee Lan Chong
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Suppression of UVC-induced cell damage and enhancement of DNA repair by the fermented milk, Kefir.

Authors:  Tsutomu Nagira; Junko Narisawa; Kiichirou Teruya; Yoshinori Katakura; Sun-Yup Shim; Ken-Ichi Kusumoto; Sennosuke Tokumaru; Koichiro Tokumaru; David W Barnes; Sanetaka Shirahata
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.058

5.  Calcium, phosphorus, vitamin D, dairy products and colorectal carcinogenesis: a French case--control study.

Authors:  M C Boutron; J Faivre; P Marteau; C Couillault; P Senesse; V Quipourt
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 6.  Role of the Microbiota in Colorectal Cancer: Updates on Microbial Associations and Therapeutic Implications.

Authors:  Olivia I Coleman; Tiago Nunes
Journal:  Biores Open Access       Date:  2016-10-01

7.  Protective role of Lactobacillus plantarum A7 against irinotecan-induced genotoxicity.

Authors:  Soheila Sepahi; Abbas Jafarian-Dehkordi; Maryam Mirlohi; Kobra Shirani; Mahmoud Etebari
Journal:  Avicenna J Phytomed       Date:  2016 May-Jun
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.