Literature DB >> 8106869

Detection of enteric adenoviruses with synthetic oligonucleotide probes.

T H Scott-Taylor1, G Ahluwalia, M Dawood, G W Hammond.   

Abstract

The abilities of hybridization probes to detect all human adenovirus types and to identify enteric adenovirus types were evaluated. The efficiency of hybridization was compared to other tests currently in routine laboratory use on clinical specimens from young children with gastroenteritis. Probes were derived from various regions of the adenovirus types 2 and 41 genomes, and were evaluated by hybridization with a series of DNA quantities from 1 microgram to 10 pg of one adenovirus type from each human subgenus, lambda phage, and HEp 2 cells. The sensitivity of hybridization with the HPII probe (92.7%), containing the conserved hexon gene, compared well with EM (54.6%), culture and neutralization (45.5%), and enzyme immunoassay (61.8%). The sensitivity of detection of enteric adenovirus isolates by the cloned Bg/II D fragment probe (92.9%) and by a synthetic probe (85.7%), manufactured from type-specific sequences of the Ad41 hexon gene were comparable to Ad40/Ad41 specific enzyme immunoassay (84.6%). Hybridization was found to be a sensitive method of adenovirus detection in comparison to traditional methods of laboratory diagnosis. Synthetic oligonucleotides enable specific detection of individual enteric adenovirus types. Hybridization had additional advantages over other tests in identifying cases of infection with more than one adenovirus type and in allowing an estimate of the concentration of adenovirus in the specimen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8106869      PMCID: PMC7166767          DOI: 10.1002/jmv.1890410414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Virol        ISSN: 0146-6615            Impact factor:   2.327


  22 in total

1.  Antipeptide antisera define neutralizing epitopes on the adenovirus hexon.

Authors:  C I Toogood; J Crompton; R T Hay
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.891

2.  Detection of enteric adenoviruses by dot-blot hybridization using a molecularly cloned viral DNA probe.

Authors:  H E Takiff; M Seidlin; P Krause; J Rooney; C Brandt; W Rodriguez; R Yolken; S E Straus
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 2.327

3.  Faecal adenoviruses from Glasgow babies. Studies on culture and identity.

Authors:  A H Kidd; B P Cosgrove; R A Brown; C R Madeley
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1982-06

4.  Nucleic acid reassociation in formamide.

Authors:  B L McConaughy; C D Laird; B J McCarthy
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Prevalent enteric adenovirus variant not detected by commercial monoclonal antibody enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  T Scott-Taylor; G Ahluwalia; B Klisko; G W Hammond
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Propagation and in vitro studies of previously non-cultivable enteral adenoviruses in 293 cells.

Authors:  H E Takiff; S E Straus; C F Garon
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1981-10-17       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  The Seattle Virus Watch. VII. Observations of adenovirus infections.

Authors:  J P Fox; C E Hall; M K Cooney
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Nucleic acid hybridization for detection of cell culture-amplified adenovirus.

Authors:  C Huang; R Deibel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  Human viral gastroenteritis.

Authors:  M L Christensen
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  Isolation and identification of enteric adenoviruses.

Authors:  R Wigand; H G Baumeister; G Maass; J Kühn; H J Hammer
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.