Literature DB >> 8106335

Adsorption of bacteriophage lambda on the LamB protein of Escherichia coli K-12: point mutations in gene J of lambda responsible for extended host range.

C Werts1, V Michel, M Hofnung, A Charbit.   

Abstract

LamB is the cell surface receptor for bacteriophage lambda. LamB missense mutations yielding resistance to lambda group in two classes. Class I mutants block the growth of lambda with the wild-type host range (lambda h+) but support the growth of one-step host range mutants (lambda h). Class II mutants block lambda h but support the growth of two-step host range mutant (lambda hh*) phages. To identify amino acid residues in the J protein (the tail fiber of phage lambda) responsible for the extended host range phenotype of mutants of phage (lambda h+), we selected a series of one-step (lambda h) and two-step (lambda hh*) host range mutants and analyzed their corresponding J genes. Three different class I LamB missense mutants (mutations at sites 247, 245, and 148) were used to select 11 independent, new, one-step host range mutants (lambda h phages). DNA sequence analysis revealed a single-amino-acid change in each case. The 11 alterations affected only three residues in the distal part of J, corresponding to a Val-->Ala change at site 1077 in five cases, a Thr-->Met change at site 1040 in three cases, and a Leu-->Pro change at site 1127 in three cases. Recombination experiments confirmed that in the cases tested, the mutations identified were indeed responsible for the extended host range phenotype. The class II LamB mutant (Gly-->Asp at site 151) was used to select two-step extended host range mutants (lambda hh* phages) from three new lambda h phages, corresponding to different amino acid modifications in the J protein (at sites 1040, 1077, and 1127). The new lambda hh* phages analyzed corresponded to either double or triple point mutations located at the distal end of the J protein. In all, seven residues involved in the extended host range properties of lambda mutants were identified in the distal part of the J protein, suggesting that the last C-terminal portion of the J protein participates directly in the adsorption of the phage onto LamB. In agreement with the fact that the lambda h mutants (and the lambda hh* mutants) could grow on all of the lamB class I mutations tested, we found tha the nature of the J mutations did not depend on the LamB class I mutant used to select them. This is interpreted as meaning that the mutated residues in the J protein and in the LamB mutants are not involved in allele-specific protein-protein interactions. Rather, the LamB mutations would block a step in phage adsorption, and this block would be overcome by the mutations in the J protein.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8106335      PMCID: PMC205142          DOI: 10.1128/jb.176.4.941-947.1994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  30 in total

1.  Reversible interaction between coliphage lambda and its receptor protein.

Authors:  M Schwartz
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1975-11-25       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  [Not Available].

Authors:  F JACOB; E L WOLLMAN
Journal:  Ann Inst Pasteur (Paris)       Date:  1954-12

3.  Mutation to extended host range and the occurrence of phenotypic mixing in the temperate coliphage lambda.

Authors:  R K APPLEYARD; J F MCGREGOR; K M BAIRD
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1956-08       Impact factor: 3.616

4.  On some genetic aspects of phage lambda resistance in E. coli K12.

Authors:  J P Thirion; M Hofnung
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Production of serum-blocking material by mutants of the left arm of the lambda chromosome.

Authors:  M Buchwald; L Siminovitch
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 3.616

6.  Maltose transport in Escherichia coli K-12: involvement of the bacteriophage lambda receptor.

Authors:  S Szmelcman; M Hofnung
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Action of the lambda chromosome. I. Control of functions late in bacteriophage development.

Authors:  W F Dove
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1966-08       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  lamB mutations in E. coli K12: growth of lambda host range mutants and effect of nonsense suppressors.

Authors:  M Hofnung; A Jezierska; C Braun-Breton
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1976-05-07

9.  Isolation of the bacteriophage lambda receptor from Escherichia coli.

Authors:  L Randall-Hazelbauer; M Schwartz
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Negative dominance in gene lamB: random assembly of secreted subunits issued from different polysomes.

Authors:  C Marchal; M Hofnung
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  32 in total

1.  Genetic control of the resistance to phage C1 of Escherichia coli K-12.

Authors:  N A Likhacheva; V V Samsonov; V V Samsonov; S P Sineoky
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 2.  Coevolution of bacteria and their viruses.

Authors:  František Golais; Jaroslav Hollý; Jana Vítkovská
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 2.099

3.  The C-terminal portion of the tail fiber protein of bacteriophage lambda is responsible for binding to LamB, its receptor at the surface of Escherichia coli K-12.

Authors:  J Wang; M Hofnung; A Charbit
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  A role for residue 151 of LamB in bacteriophage lambda adsorption: possible steric effect of amino acid substitutions.

Authors:  A Charbit; C Werts; V Michel; P E Klebba; P Quillardet; M Hofnung
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  The protein interaction network of bacteriophage lambda with its host, Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Sonja Blasche; Stefan Wuchty; Seesandra V Rajagopala; Peter Uetz
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Influence of Internal DNA Pressure on Stability and Infectivity of Phage λ.

Authors:  D W Bauer; A Evilevitch
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 7.  Bacteriophage protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Roman Häuser; Sonja Blasche; Terje Dokland; Elisabeth Haggård-Ljungquist; Albrecht von Brunn; Margarita Salas; Sherwood Casjens; Ian Molineux; Peter Uetz
Journal:  Adv Virus Res       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 9.937

8.  Bacteriophage ecology in commercial sauerkraut fermentations.

Authors:  Z Lu; F Breidt; V Plengvidhya; H P Fleming
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  The core oligosaccharide and thioredoxin of Vibrio cholerae are necessary for binding and propagation of its typing phage VP3.

Authors:  Jingyun Zhang; Wei Li; Qian Zhang; Hongxia Wang; Xiao Xu; Baowei Diao; Lijuan Zhang; Biao Kan
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  High adsorption rate is detrimental to bacteriophage fitness in a biofilm-like environment.

Authors:  Romain Gallet; Yongping Shao; Ing-Nang Wang
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.