Literature DB >> 8105676

Prognostic value of proliferating cell nuclear antigen index in gastric stromal tumors. Correlation with mitotic count and clinical outcome.

M B Amin1, C K Ma, M D Linden, J J Kubus, R J Zarbo.   

Abstract

Morphologic studies of gastric stromal tumors (GSTs) indicate that mitotic counts (MCs) and tumor size are major discriminants predictive of biologic behavior. The authors evaluated the tumor proliferation of GSTs with anti-proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA; DAKO clone PC10, DAKO Corporation, Carpinteria, CA) for correlation with MCs, histologic cell type, and clinical outcome. Fifty-eight tumors ranging from 1.5 to 45 cm in size were selected for clinicopathologic assessment. Mitotic activity was counted per 50 high-power fields (MC). For this study, combined parameters of MC and tumor size were used to categorize tumors into three groups: (1) benign: MC less than 5, tumor smaller than 5 cm; (2) borderline: MC less than 5, tumor larger than 5 cm; and (3) malignant: MC greater than 5, tumor any size. The PCNA tumor proliferation index (TPI) was assessed from evaluation of 200 tumor cells per case and expressed as the percentage of cells with positive results. Clinical follow-up was available in 45 cases. None of the 19 benign or 16 borderline tumors recurred or metastasized, whereas 7 of 10 malignant tumors metastasized and 1 of 10 recurred. The mean PCNA TPI values among benign (11.2%), borderline (16%), and malignant (34.5%) tumors were significantly different (P = 0.0002, Kruskal-Wallis test). When the pathologic tumor categories were compared, the mean TPI of benign tumors was significantly different from that of borderline tumors (P = 0.0306, Kruskal-Wallis), and the TPI of borderline tumors was different from that of the malignant tumors (P = 0.0060, Kruskal-Wallis test). The Spearman rank correlation showed a significant relationship between the MC and PCNA TPI (P = 0.0003, r = 0.4543). Logistic regression analysis showed that the TPI, independent of MC and size, contributed significantly (P = 0.00295) to the prediction of outcome. In the malignant group, the mean TPI for malignant tumors with metastases (43.6%) was significantly different (P = 0.0411, Kruskal-Wallis test) from that of malignant tumors without metastases (including the case with probable recurrence) (11.83%). No correlation was found when PCNA TPIs for epithelioid GCTs were compared with those of spindle cell GSTs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8105676     DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/100.4.428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  19 in total

Review 1.  Suddenly accelerated growth of gastrointestinal stromal tumor of remnant stomach.

Authors:  Kayoko Shimizu; Hideki Koga; Masaharu Takeda; Yoshiki Mikami; Tsukasa Tsunoda; Mitsuo Iida; Ken Haruma
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Spontaneous Peritoneal Rupture of Gastric Stromal Tumor.

Authors:  Kutay Sağlam; Serdar Topaloğlu; Mithat Kerim Arslan; Sevdegül Mungan; Adnan Çalık
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2017-03

3.  Surgical management of small gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach.

Authors:  Makoto Iwahashi; Katsunari Takifuji; Toshiyasu Ojima; Masaki Nakamura; Mikihito Nakamori; Yoshihiro Nakatani; Kentaro Ueda; Koichiro Ishida; Teiji Naka; Kazuo Ono; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Primary large gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the liver: report of a case.

Authors:  Toshiya Ochiai; Teruhisa Sonoyama; Shojiro Kikuchi; Hisashi Ikoma; Takeshi Kubota; Masayoshi Nakanishi; Daisuke Ichikawa; Shijiro Kikuchi; Hitoshi Fujiwara; Kazuma Okamoto; Chohei Sakakura; Yukihito Kokuba; Hiroki Taniguchi; Eigo Otsuji
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 5.  Preoperative staging of gastric cancer as precondition for multimodal treatment.

Authors:  A Sendler; H J Dittler; H Feussner; H Nekarda; E Bollschweiler; U Fink; H Helmberger; H Höfler; J R Siewert
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for a large gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the stomach.

Authors:  Hiroshi Yano; Yutaka Kimura; Takashi Iwazawa; Hirotoshi Takemoto; Mitsunobu Imasato; Takushi Monden; Shigeru Okamoto
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 7.370

7.  Ectopic pancreas of the gastric antrum contiguous to a gastrointestinal stromal tumor manifesting as upper gastrointestinal bleeding: report of a case.

Authors:  Zafer Teke; Burhan Kabay; Canan Kelten; Mustafa Yilmaz; Ender Duzcan
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 8.  [Gastrointestinal stromal tumors. A morphologic and molecular genetic independent tumor entity with new therapeutic perspectives].

Authors:  G Mechtersheimer; T Lehnert; R Penzel; S Joos; G Egerer; H F Otto
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2003-03-21       Impact factor: 1.011

9.  Immunohistochemical and molecular analysis of p53, MDM2, proliferating cell nuclear antigen and Ki67 in benign and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours.

Authors:  L G Kindblom; M Ahldén; J M Meis-Kindblom; G Stenman
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.064

10.  Expression and prognostic role of molecular markers in 99 KIT-positive gastric stromal tumors in Taiwanese.

Authors:  Tsung-Hui Hu; Seng-Kee Chuah; Jui-Wei Lin; Yi-Chun Chiu; Chi-Sin Changchien; Chih-Chi Wang; Yaw-Sen Chen; Li-Na Yi; King-Wah Chiu; Chuan-Mo Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.