Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in three adjacent health districts of south-east England 1986-91.

The experiences with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) of two contiguous Health Districts during 1986-91 and of a third mutually adjacent District in south-east England during 1989-91 were compared. Although the three Districts were in many ways similar, the nature of the problems posed by MRSA differed. The Districts had dealt with MRSA independently but had evolved similar strategies for coping with the organism. In two Districts a gradual relaxation of case-finding and of infection control precautions applied to individual patients and outbreaks, was followed by a reduction in the number of new patient-isolates identified from routine bacteriology specimens. Standardization of MRSA isolation rates for patient throughput and for length of hospital stay showed the examination of crude total isolates to provide misleading comparisons of relative risks of acquiring MRSA in different specialties. It was also found that patients discharged from specialties with short inpatient stays were more likely to have MRSA detected after discharge by their physicians working in the local community served by the hospitals but there was no evidence of spread outside hospital. It is suggested that good all-round standards of infection control practice are more important than specific radical policies in dealing with endemic MRSA.