Literature DB >> 8104776

Analysis of Hox-4.5 and Hox-3.6 expression during newt limb regeneration: differential regulation of paralogous Hox genes suggest different roles for members of different Hox clusters.

H G Simon1, C J Tabin.   

Abstract

Adult urodele amphibians can regenerate their limbs and tail. Based on their roles in other developing systems, Hox genes are strong candidates for genes that play a role in regulating pattern formation during regeneration. There are four homologous clusters of Hox genes in vertebrate genomes. We isolated cDNA clones of two newt homeobox genes from homologous positions within two Hox clusters; Hox-4.5 and Hox-3.6. We used RNase protection on nonamputated (normal) and regenerating newt appendages and tissue to compare their transcriptional patterns. Both genes show increased expression upon amputation with similar kinetics. Hox-4.5 and Hox-3.6 transcription is limited to the mesenchymal cells in the regenerates and is not found in the epithelial tissue. In addition to regenerating appendages, both genes are transcriptionally active in adult kidney of the newt. Striking differences were found in the regulation of Hox-4.5 and Hox-3.6 when they were compared in unamputated limbs and in regenerating forelimbs versus regenerating hindlimbs. Hox-4.5 is expressed in the blastema of regenerating fore- and hindlimbs, but Hox-4.5 transcripts are not detectable in normal limbs. In contrast, Hox-3.6 transcripts are found exclusively in posterior appendages, but are present in normal as well as regenerating hindlimbs and tails. Hox-4.5 is also expressed at a higher level in proximal (mid-humerus) regenerates than in distal ones (mid-radius). When we proximalized the positional memory of a distal blastema with retinoic acid, we find that the early expression level of Hox-4.5 is also proximalized. When the expression of these genes is compared to the expression of two previously reported newt Hox genes, a consistent pattern emerges, which can be interpreted in terms of differential roles for the different Hox clusters in determining regenerative limb morphology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8104776     DOI: 10.1242/dev.117.4.1397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  11 in total

1.  Early mitotic degradation of the homeoprotein HOXC10 is potentially linked to cell cycle progression.

Authors:  Davide Gabellini; Ivan N Colaluca; Hartmut C Vodermaier; Giuseppe Biamonti; Mauro Giacca; Arturo Falaschi; Silvano Riva; Fiorenzo A Peverali
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Expression of Sonic hedgehog gene in regenerating newt limb blastemas recapitulates that in developing limb buds.

Authors:  Y Imokawa; K Yoshizato
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-08-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Evolutionary analyses of hedgehog and Hoxd-10 genes in fish species closely related to the zebrafish.

Authors:  R Zardoya; E Abouheif; A Meyer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Hoxa-10 deficiency alters region-specific gene expression and perturbs differentiation of natural killer cells during decidualization.

Authors:  Mohammad A Rahman; Meiling Li; Ping Li; Haibin Wang; Sudhansu K Dey; Sanjoy K Das
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 3.582

5.  Msh homeobox 1 (Msx1)- and Msx2-overexpressing bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells resemble blastema cells and enhance regeneration in mice.

Authors:  Leila Taghiyar; Mahdi Hesaraki; Forough Azam Sayahpour; Leila Satarian; Samaneh Hosseini; Naser Aghdami; Mohamadreza Baghaban Eslaminejad
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Differential expression of bone morphogenetic proteins in the developing vestibular and auditory sensory organs.

Authors:  S H Oh; R Johnson; D K Wu
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Network based transcription factor analysis of regenerating axolotl limbs.

Authors:  Deepali Jhamb; Nandini Rao; Derek J Milner; Fengyu Song; Jo Ann Cameron; David L Stocum; Mathew J Palakal
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Position-specific induction of ectopic limbs in non-regenerating blastemas on axolotl forelimbs.

Authors:  Catherine McCusker; Jeffrey Lehrberg; David Gardiner
Journal:  Regeneration (Oxf)       Date:  2014-02-16

9.  Expression of Hox genes during regeneration of nereid polychaete Alitta (Nereis) virens (Annelida, Lophotrochozoa).

Authors:  Elena L Novikova; Nadezhda I Bakalenko; Alexander Y Nesterenko; Milana A Kulakova
Journal:  Evodevo       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 2.250

10.  Multi-tissue microarray analysis identifies a molecular signature of regeneration.

Authors:  Sarah E Mercer; Chia-Ho Cheng; Donald L Atkinson; Jennifer Krcmery; Claudia E Guzman; David T Kent; Katherine Zukor; Kenneth A Marx; Shannon J Odelberg; Hans-Georg Simon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.