Literature DB >> 8102498

Biliary lithotripsy as an adjunct to laparoscopic common bile duct stone extraction.

B Carroll1, M Chandra, T Papaioannou, L Daykhovsky, W Grundfest, E Phillips.   

Abstract

We investigated various energy sources and delivery systems suitable for fragmentation of common duct calculi by a laparoscopic technique. We evaluated electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) using 1.9-Fr probe delivering 80 W and laser lithotripsy using a 200-micron(s) fiber delivering 30-70 mJ/pulse at 5-20 Hz. In vitro biliary stone fragmentation analysis suggested that the laser lithotripsy produced a more controllable fragmentation than EHL. Initial attempts to employ EHL techniques in animal models resulted in common bile duct injury or inadequate fragmentation of stones. In contrast, biliary lithotripsy was accomplished in pigs using the pulsed-dye laser at 10 Hz and 60 mJ/pulse. Histologic evaluation revealed no evidence of ductal injury related to laser stone fragmentation. Subsequently, laser common duct lithotripsy was used in two human subjects. One patient had a 1.8-cm impacted ampullary stone and one patient had a 3-cm intrahepatic stone. In both cases, the stones were removed laparoscopically after laser fragmentation. Our experience suggests that the laser lithotripsy may facilitate laparoscopic common duct stone extraction procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8102498     DOI: 10.1007/bf00725957

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  7 in total

1.  Laparoscopic choledochoscopy: an effective approach to the common duct.

Authors:  B J Carroll; E H Phillips; L Daykhovsky; W S Grundfest; A Gershman; M Fallas; M Chandra
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1992-02

2.  High-speed photographic evaluation of endoscopic lithotripsy devices.

Authors:  H J Sterenborg; T M de Reijke; J Wiersma; R C Erckens; F H Jogsma
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1991

Review 3.  Laser lithotripsy: a review of 20 years of research and clinical applications.

Authors:  S P Dretler
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.025

4.  Laser lithotripsy: animal studies of safety and efficacy.

Authors:  N S Nishioka; P B Kelsey; A G Kibbi; F Delmonico; J A Parrish; R R Anderson
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.025

5.  Electrohydraulic lithotripsy of intrahepatic stones during choledochoscopy.

Authors:  S Matsumoto; M Tanaka; H Yoshimoto; K Miyazaki; S Ikeda; F Nakayama
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Two approaches for electrohydraulic lithotripsy in the common bile duct.

Authors:  M Tanaka; H Yoshimoto; S Ikeda; S Matsumoto; R X Guo
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Endoscopic lithotripsy in the common bile duct.

Authors:  H Koch; W Rösch; V Walz
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 9.427

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Laparoscopic endobiliary stenting: a simplified approach to the management of occult common bile duct stones.

Authors:  R D Fanelli; K S Gersin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Laparoscopic transcystic choledochoscopy.

Authors:  B J Carroll; M J Fallas; E H Phillips
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.584

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.