Literature DB >> 8100133

Is segmentation generic?

S A Newman1.   

Abstract

When two populations of cells within a tissue mass differ from one another in magnitude or type of intercellular adhesions, a boundary can form within the tissue, across which cells will fail to mix. This phenomenon may occur regardless of the identity of the molecules that mediate cell adhesion. If, in addition, a choice between the two adhesive states is regulated by a molecule the concentration of which is periodic in space, or in time, then alternating bands of non-mixing tissue, or segments, can form. But temporal or spatial periodicities in concentration will tend to arise for any molecule that is positively autoregulatory. It is therefore proposed that segmentation is a 'generic' property of metazoan organisms, and that metamerism would be expected to have emerged numerous times during evolution. A simple model of segmentation, based solely on differential adhesion and periodic regulation of adhesion, can account for segment properties as disparate as those seen in long and short germ band insects, and for diverse experimental results on boundary regeneration in the chick hind brain and the insect cuticle. It is suggested that the complex, multicomponent segment-forming systems found in contemporary organisms (e.g., Drosophila) are the products of evolutionary recruitment of molecular cues such as homeobox gene products, that increase the reliability and stability of metameric patterns originally templated by generic self-organizing properties of tissues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8100133     DOI: 10.1002/bies.950150409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioessays        ISSN: 0265-9247            Impact factor:   4.345


  8 in total

Review 1.  Developmental mechanisms: putting genes in their place.

Authors:  Stuart A Newman
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Can tissue surface tension drive somite formation?

Authors:  Ramon Grima; Santiago Schnell
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 3.  From segment to somite: segmentation to epithelialization analyzed within quantitative frameworks.

Authors:  Paul M Kulesa; Santiago Schnell; Stefan Rudloff; Ruth E Baker; Philip K Maini
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.780

4.  Cell state switching factors and dynamical patterning modules: complementary mediators of plasticity in development and evolution.

Authors:  Stuart A Newman; Ramray Bhat; Nadejda V Mezentseva
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 5.  Form and function remixed: developmental physiology in the evolution of vertebrate body plans.

Authors:  Stuart A Newman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 6.  Patterning, From Conifers to Consciousness: Turing's Theory and Order From Fluctuations.

Authors:  Thurston C Lacalli
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-05-03

Review 7.  Waves and patterning in developmental biology: vertebrate segmentation and feather bud formation as case studies.

Authors:  Ruth E Baker; Santiago Schnell; Philip K Maini
Journal:  Int J Dev Biol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.203

8.  Ancient role of ten-m/odz in segmentation and the transition from sequential to syncytial segmentation.

Authors:  Axel Hunding; Stefan Baumgartner
Journal:  Hereditas       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.271

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.